Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Gartner Inc (IT)

710 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in IT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -86
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
46%

Smart Money Signals — IT

Based on 720 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their IT positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 78% of 3.0Y peak

78% of all-time peak
720 funds currently hold this stock — 78% of the 3.0-year high of 924 funds (reached 2024 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉

Outflows — 20% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
181 fewer hedge funds hold IT compared to a year ago (-20% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 46% buying

382 buying441 selling
Last quarter: 441 funds reduced or exited vs 382 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-42 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 99 → 127 → 147 → 105. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

64% of holders stayed for 2+ years

64% conviction (2yr+) 18% medium 19% new
458 out of 720 hedge funds have held IT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +1%, value -34%

Value
-34%
Shares
+0%
Last quarter: funds added +1% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -34%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

96 → 99 → 127 → 147 → 105 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 99 → 127 → 147 → 105. A growing number of institutions are discovering IT each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 69% veterans vs 22% newcomers

69% veterans 9% 1-2yr 22% new
Entry-cohort mix of 743 holders: 511 (69%) are 2+ year veterans, 66 entered 1–2 years ago, and 166 (22%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 52% AUM from top-100 funds

52% from top-100 AUM funds
67 of 715 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 52% of total institutional value in IT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
2.6
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — IT

In 2026 Q1, 382 hedge funds were net buyers of IT (105 opened a new position, 277 added to an existing one), while 441 reduced or exited (250 trimmed, 191 sold completely) — a 46% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. 52% of total institutional value in IT is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -86 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 720.

Hedge Fund Ownership: IT

How many hedge funds hold IT — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of IT vs. share price

Market Analysis: IT

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: IT

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Broad Consensus, Selective Conviction

Many quality funds hold this stock, but top-tier positions remain relatively small.

53 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
7.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.5
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: IT
2026 Q2 Stats Unlock in 5 days 710 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in IT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 710 805 -11.8%
13F Shares 75M 75M -0.44%
Total Value $11.66B $18.30B -36.28%
New Positions 100 147 -47
Increased Positions 273 253 +20
Closed Positions 195 121 +74
Reduced Positions 236 311 -75
Total Calls 13 13 -
Total Puts 14 11 27.27%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.08 0.85 Neutral

Statistics: IT

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

710 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in IT. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
2026 Q2 filings are still coming in. Only funds that have filed so far are shown — top holders may not have reported yet. Full 13F data typically settles by ~50 days after quarter-end.
Top 25 IT holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Independent Franchise Partners LLP 4.75% 5,582,962 $723.7M
2 Triad Investment Management 4.36% 30,530 $4.0M
3 Black Creek Investment Management Inc. 3.87% 532,034 $69.0M
4 Quantum Capital Management, LLC / NJ 2.44% 150,315 $19.5M
5 Foyston, Gordon & Payne Inc 2.16% 77,515 $10.1M
6 Clarkston Capital Partners, LLC 2.16% 197,571 $25.6M
7 Crown Oak Advisors, LLC 1.41% 23,433 $3.0M
8 Shapiro Capital Management LLC 1.36% 173,095 $22.4M
9 Knightsbridge Asset Management, LLC 0.98% 27,660 $7.0M
10 Schwerin Boyle Capital Management Inc 0.91% 57,544 $7.5M
11 Madison Asset Management, LLC 0.89% 574,609 $74.5M
12 Isthmus Partners, LLC 0.84% 67,111 $8.7M
13 Arlington Partners LLC 0.43% 1,850 $240K
14 Federated Hermes, INC. 0.38% 2,044,435 $265.0M
15 Diamond Hill Capital Management, LLC (Investment Advisor) 0.37% 360,635 $46.7M
16 Eukles Asset Management 0.36% 6,747 $875K
17 Douglas Lane & Associates, LLC 0.33% 186,744 $24.2M
18 Sendero Wealth Management, LLC 0.33% 25,292 $3.3M
19 Shade Tree Advisors LLC 0.28% 3,740 $485K
20 Cardinal Capital Management 0.28% 17,553 $2.3M
21 FORA Capital, LLC 0.26% 29,452 $3.8M
22 Ossiam 0.24% 137,782 $17.9M
23 Ruffer LLP 0.21% 46,780 $6.1M
24 Dynamic Technology Lab Private Ltd 0.21% 7,139 $925K
25 Bull Harbor Capital LLC 0.20% 7,926 $1.0M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Gartner Inc (IT)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for IT?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their IT positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for IT?

More sellers than buyers — 46% buying: Last quarter: 441 funds reduced or exited vs 382 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for IT holders?

Elite ownership — 52% AUM from top-100 funds: 67 of 715 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 52% of total institutional value in IT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held IT?

64% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 458 out of 720 hedge funds have held IT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →