Based on 17 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
📊
High ownership — 81% of 3.0Y peak
81% of all-time peak
17 funds currently hold this stock — 81% of the 3.0-year high of 21 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 15% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
3 fewer hedge funds hold TSLQ compared to a year ago (-15% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 41% buying
9 buying13 selling
Last quarter: 13 funds reduced or exited vs 9 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~5 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 8 → 6 → 7 → 5. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔄
Mostly new holders — 24% entered in last year
■ 24% conviction (2yr+)
■ 53% medium
■ 24% new
Only 4 funds (24%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💰
Price up while funds trimmed (-34% value, -52% shares)
Last quarter: total value of institutional TSLQ holdings rose -34% even though funds reduced share count by 52%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~5 new funds/quarter
10 → 8 → 6 → 7 → 5 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 8 → 6 → 7 → 5. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 10% veterans, 35% new entrants
■ 10% veterans
■ 55% 1-2yr
■ 35% new
Of 20 current holders: 2 (10%) held 2+ years, 11 held 1–2 years, 7 (35%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
🏆
Elite ownership — 81% AUM from top-100 funds
81% from top-100 AUM funds
9 of 17 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 81% of total institutional value in TSLQ. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 3.1/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.