Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Atlanta Braves Hldgs Inc (BATRK)

314 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in BATRK. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +8
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
59%

Smart Money Signals — BATRK

Based on 316 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added BATRK than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
316 hedge funds hold BATRK right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +10% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+29 new funds entered over the past year (+10% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 59% buying

158 buying112 selling
Last quarter: 158 funds bought or added vs 112 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-7 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 33 → 34 → 54 → 47. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

53% of holders stayed for 2+ years

53% conviction (2yr+) 22% medium 24% new
168 out of 316 hedge funds have held BATRK for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -2%, value -85%

Value
-85%
Shares
-2%
Last quarter: funds added -2% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -85%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

50 → 33 → 34 → 54 → 47 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 33 → 34 → 54 → 47. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 59% veterans vs 27% newcomers

59% veterans 15% 1-2yr 27% new
Entry-cohort mix of 322 holders: 189 (59%) are 2+ year veterans, 47 entered 1–2 years ago, and 86 (27%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.

Strong quality — 35% AUM from major funds

35% from top-100 AUM funds
49 of 316 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 35% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
3.8
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — BATRK

In 2026 Q2, 158 hedge funds were net buyers of BATRK (47 opened a new position, 111 added to an existing one), while 112 reduced or exited (73 trimmed, 39 sold completely) — a 59% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 35% of total institutional value in BATRK is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +8 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 316.

Hedge Fund Ownership: BATRK

How many hedge funds hold BATRK — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of BATRK vs. share price

Market Analysis: BATRK

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: BATRK

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

13 top-rated funds 4 high-conviction
Consensus
5.0
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
2.7
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: BATRK
314 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in BATRK. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 314 308 1.95%
13F Shares 44M 47M -7.18%
Total Value $2.14B $14.95B -85.71%
New Positions 47 54 -7
Increased Positions 109 96 +13
Closed Positions 41 28 +13
Reduced Positions 72 80 -8
Total Calls 3 3 -
Total Puts 3 1 200.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 0.33 Neutral

Statistics: BATRK

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

314 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in BATRK. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 BATRK holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Breach Inlet Capital Management, LLC 13.47% 778,518 $40.4M
2 Broad Bay Capital Management, LP 9.92% 2,046,239 $106.2M
3 Tensile Capital Management LP 5.40% 753,879 $39.1M
4 Freshford Capital Management, LLC 4.50% 253,255 $13.1M
5 Bayberry Capital Partners LP 3.76% 210,000 $10.9M
6 AWH Capital, L.P. 3.66% 100,600 $5.2M
7 Bislett Management, LLC 3.63% 103,330 $5.4M
8 Hawk Ridge Capital Management LP 3.29% 1,975,760 $102.5M
9 Scopia Capital Management LP 3.16% 67,995 $3.5M
10 Harvey Partners, LLC 2.69% 756,832 $39.3M
11 Michelson Medical Research Foundation, Inc. 2.16% 45,130 $2.3M
12 Boyar Asset Management INC. 1.76% 59,233 $3.1M
13 Southeastern Asset Management Inc/Tn/ 1.64% 605,091 $31.4M
14 Alta Fundamental Advisers LLC 1.55% 99,400 $5.2M
15 Intrepid Capital Management Inc 1.40% 76,003 $3.9M
16 Irenic Capital Management LP 1.26% 504,983 $26.2M
17 Elgethun Capital Management 1.23% 169,818 $8.8M
18 VELA Investment Management, LLC 1.21% 109,086 $5.7M
19 Oak Family Advisors, LLC 1.21% 90,935 $4.7M
20 Parthenon LLC 1.14% 211,315 $11.0M
21 Shapiro Capital Management LLC 1.13% 359,679 $18.7M
22 Tabor Asset Management, LP 1.11% 69,792 $3.6M
23 Dendur Capital LP 0.88% 323,000 $16.8M
24 J.M. Arbour, LLC 0.83% 18,658 $968K
25 Buckland Partners Management Co LLC 0.77% 30,319 $1.6M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Atlanta Braves Hldgs Inc (BATRK)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for BATRK?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added BATRK than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for BATRK?

Slight buying edge — 59% buying: Last quarter: 158 funds bought or added vs 112 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for BATRK holders?

Strong quality — 35% AUM from major funds: 49 of 316 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 35% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held BATRK?

53% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 168 out of 316 hedge funds have held BATRK for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →