Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Arcosa Inc (ACA)

419 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ACA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +50
Streak
5Q ▲
Buyers last Q
58%

Smart Money Signals — ACA

Based on 423 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ACA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
423 hedge funds hold ACA right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +32% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+102 new funds entered over the past year (+32% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 58% buying

229 buying168 selling
Last quarter: 229 funds bought or added vs 168 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+41 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new ACA position: 63 → 63 → 60 → 101. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

55% of holders stayed for 2+ years

55% conviction (2yr+) 17% medium 29% new
231 out of 423 hedge funds have held ACA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +41% but shares only +16% — price-driven

Value
+41%
Shares
+16%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +41%, but actual share count only changed +16%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

47 → 63 → 63 → 60 → 101 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 63 → 63 → 60 → 101. A growing number of institutions are discovering ACA each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 60% veterans vs 30% newcomers

60% veterans 10% 1-2yr 30% new
Entry-cohort mix of 427 holders: 257 (60%) are 2+ year veterans, 42 entered 1–2 years ago, and 128 (30%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 57% AUM from top-100 funds

57% from top-100 AUM funds
55 of 423 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 57% of total institutional value in ACA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.0
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.0/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — ACA

In 2026 Q2, 229 hedge funds were net buyers of ACA (101 opened a new position, 128 added to an existing one), while 168 reduced or exited (117 trimmed, 51 sold completely) — a 58% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 5 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 57% of total institutional value in ACA is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +50 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 423.

Hedge Fund Ownership: ACA

How many hedge funds hold ACA — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of ACA vs. share price

Market Analysis: ACA

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: ACA

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

17 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
5.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.6
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: ACA
419 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in ACA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 419 373 12.33%
13F Shares 45M 46M -1.34%
Total Value $6.33B $4.53B 39.89%
New Positions 100 60 +40
Increased Positions 127 125 +2
Closed Positions 54 42 +12
Reduced Positions 113 112 +1
Total Calls 3 3 -
Total Puts 1 1 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.33 0.33 Bullish

Statistics: ACA

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

419 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ACA. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 ACA holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Orchard Capital Management, LLC 3.86% 27,260 $4.0M
2 Punch & Associates Investment Management, INC. 2.50% 347,540 $50.5M
3 Water Island Capital LLC 2.35% 173,589 $25.2M
4 Slotnik Capital, LLC 1.69% 45,000 $6.5M
5 TIG Advisors, LLC 1.54% 239,765 $34.8M
6 Marathon Capital Management 1.33% 45,166 $6.6M
7 Royce & Associates LP 1.16% 993,710 $144.4M
8 Schuylkill Financial LLC 1.03% 7,673 $1.1M
9 Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC 0.91% 952,619 $138.4M
10 Fortress Investment Group LLC 0.89% 32,500 $4.7M
11 Oberweis Asset Management Inc/ 0.89% 295,450 $42.9M
12 Kintayl Capital LP 0.79% 13,735 $2.0M
13 Kennondale Capital Management LLC 0.78% 8,103 $1.2M
14 Abc Arbitrage SA 0.76% 48,218 $7.0M
15 Versor Investments LP 0.75% 2,469 $359K
16 Hodges Capital Management Inc. 0.72% 75,145 $10.9M
17 TCTC Holdings, LLC 0.70% 182,284 $26.5M
18 Consolidated Investment Group LLC 0.68% 54,245 $7.9M
19 GABELLI & Co INVESTMENT ADVISERS, INC. 0.59% 27,791 $4.0M
20 Pentwater Capital Management LP 0.59% 660,000 $95.9M
21 Menard Financial Group LLC 0.53% 6,714 $975K
22 AQR Arbitrage LLC 0.50% 242,389 $35.2M
23 Integrated Quantitative Investments LLC 0.49% 20,597 $3.0M
24 Corient IA LP 0.44% 3,297 $479K
25 Magnetar Financial LLC 0.42% 316,267 $46.0M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Arcosa Inc (ACA)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for ACA?

Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row: For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ACA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for ACA?

Slight buying edge — 58% buying: Last quarter: 229 funds bought or added vs 168 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for ACA holders?

Elite ownership — 57% AUM from top-100 funds: 55 of 423 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 57% of total institutional value in ACA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held ACA?

55% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 231 out of 423 hedge funds have held ACA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →