These figures pool every individual call made by Piper Sandler's analysts into a single sample — so a prolific analyst carries more weight than a low-volume one, exactly in proportion to the evidence available. All metrics are computed independently by 13Foresight from historical prices.
| Analyst | Our Rank | Stars | Success | Avg Return | vs S&P | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro analyst | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pro analyst | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pro analyst | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pro analyst | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pro analyst | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pro analyst | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Jessica Tassan | #365 | ★★★★ | 72% | +10.2% | +1.3% | 18 |
| Rob Owens | #432 | ★★★★ | 55% | +13.7% | +9.0% | 44 |
| Stephen Scouten | #528 | ★★★★ | 64% | +3.7% | -4.0% | 39 |
| Crispin Love | #541 | ★★★★ | 60% | +5.5% | -0.8% | 30 |
| Nathan Race | #583 | ★★★★ | 64% | +1.3% | -4.2% | 39 |
| John Barnidge | #590 | ★★★★ | 64% | +4.1% | -3.3% | 33 |
| Justin Crowley | #677 | ★★★★ | 59% | +3.9% | -2.6% | 27 |
| Paul Newsome | #888 | ★★★ | 62% | -6.1% | -9.6% | 50 |
| Matthew Clark | #960 | ★★★ | 58% | +1.6% | -5.8% | 43 |
| Peter Keith | #1020 | ★★★ | 69% | +3.4% | -2.9% | 39 |
| David Amsellem | #1102 | ★★★ | 62% | +1.9% | -1.7% | 45 |
| Kelsey Goodwin | #1233 | ★★★ | 57% | +16.1% | +7.3% | 21 |
| James Fish | #1277 | ★★★ | 41% | +10.0% | +6.3% | 37 |
| Allison Bratzel | #1279 | ★★★ | 52% | +1.2% | -3.2% | 27 |
| Patrick Moley | #1314 | ★★★ | 48% | -0.3% | -3.8% | 27 |
| Ryan Todd | #1474 | ★★★ | 50% | +19.1% | +4.5% | 28 |
| Michael Lavery | #1594 | ★★★ | 49% | +1.9% | -7.8% | 39 |
| Billy Fitzsimmons | #1603 | ★★★ | 39% | -1.9% | -3.2% | 28 |
| David Westenberg | #1681 | ★★★ | 45% | +72.8% | +69.5% | 33 |
| Jason Bednar | #1695 | ★★★ | 46% | -1.9% | -5.9% | 28 |
| James Callahan CFA | #1815 | ★★ | 17% | -9.7% | -13.8% | 6 |
| Thomas Champion | #1831 | ★★ | 39% | +7.5% | -0.1% | 36 |
| Anna Andreeva | #1876 | ★★ | 42% | +5.5% | -1.1% | 38 |
| Brian Mullan | #2061 | ★★ | 41% | -4.5% | -12.4% | 34 |
| Derek Podhaizer | #2163 | ★★ | 24% | -5.8% | -8.4% | 25 |
| Adam Maeder | #2167 | ★★ | 41% | -5.4% | -12.1% | 17 |
| Mark Lear | #2211 | ★★ | 41% | -6.8% | -18.9% | 29 |
| Matthew O'Brien | #2222 | ★★ | 50% | -0.9% | -8.7% | 60 |
| Alexander Potter | #2436 | ★ | 37% | +3.9% | -11.3% | 35 |
| Yasmeen Rahimi | #2460 | ★ | 34% | -7.0% | -16.2% | 61 |
| Biren Amin | #2520 | ★ | 32% | +1.1% | -10.6% | 68 |
| Edward Tenthoff | #2534 | ★ | 34% | -2.1% | -12.2% | 64 |
| Clarke Jeffries | #2551 | ★ | 7% | -20.7% | -31.4% | 28 |
| Hannah Rudoff | #2557 | ★ | 8% | -29.9% | -38.6% | 25 |
| Gregory Zingone | — | — | 50% | -1.2% | -8.1% | 2 |
The 6 top-ranked analysts at Piper Sandler, the firm's full 3- and 5-year track record, and firm-vs-firm rankings across Wall Street. Everything below the top 6, plus 1- and 2-year history, stays free — Pro is what keeps this independent research running and the servers paid for.
Upgrade to ProDisclaimer: Firm-level performance is calculated independently by 13Foresight by pooling the historical calls of analysts associated with this firm, measured against market prices. It may be incomplete or delayed, is for research purposes only, and is not investment advice.