Live Analyst Rating Changes 1527 upgrades, downgrades & price-target moves · freshest Wall Street data, updated daily View live feed →
Analyst Tracker/Firms/Goldman Sachs
GS

Goldman Sachs

123 tracked analysts · 1923 measured calls · pooled track record
52%
Pooled Success Rate
+20.2%
Avg Return / Call
+6.5%
vs S&P 500
123
Analysts Tracked

These figures pool every individual call made by Goldman Sachs's analysts into a single sample — so a prolific analyst carries more weight than a low-volume one, exactly in proportion to the evidence available. All metrics are computed independently by 13Foresight from historical prices.

Goldman Sachs — Analyst Roster & Track Records 123 analysts · top 6 Pro-only
Analyst Our Rank Stars Success Avg Return vs S&P Calls
Pro analyst
Pro analyst
Pro analyst
Pro analyst
Pro analyst
Pro analyst
Paul Young #256 ★★★★★ 100% +27.5% +17.4% 5
David Roman #283 ★★★★ 57% +1.8% +1.0% 35
Andrea Tan #286 ★★★★ 87% +20.2% +2.4% 15
Ziyi Chen #307 ★★★★ 100% +34.0% +5.9% 5
Alexander Duval #311 ★★★★ 70% +34.6% +22.1% 10
Mark Delaney #315 ★★★★ 58% +12.4% +2.9% 48
Matthew Dellatorre #346 ★★★★ 100% +30.1% +21.2% 3
Nick Cash #388 ★★★★ 75% +11.5% +6.0% 8
Katherine Murphy #389 ★★★★ 53% +21.2% +19.4% 15
Ben Andrews #390 ★★★★ 100% +19.1% +6.1% 4
Andrea Newkirk #426 ★★★★ 54% +77.6% +62.0% 13
Daniela Costa #463 ★★★★ 86% +17.0% -2.9% 7
Mike Harris CFA #506 ★★★★ 80% +19.8% +7.5% 5
Jordan Alliger #518 ★★★★ 70% +6.4% -2.9% 20
Gustavo Miele #566 ★★★★ 100% +3.8% -1.7% 3
Patrick Creuset #624 ★★★★ 75% +17.4% +4.5% 4
Irma Sgarz #626 ★★★★ 100% +11.8% -11386.3% 6
Allen Chang #632 ★★★★ 62% +71.7% +58.9% 8
Stephen Laszczyk #649 ★★★★ 54% +1805.3% +1799.3% 13
Adrien Duverger #673 ★★★★ 67% +10.2% +8.6% 3
Shuo Yang #718 ★★★★ 67% +11.9% -0.9% 6
Andrzej Tomczyk #797 ★★★ 50% +11.5% +8.2% 4
Marcio Farid #824 ★★★ 43% +104.2% +96.8% 7
Brooke Roach #838 ★★★ 64% +0.6% -5.0% 33
Andrew Lee #844 ★★★ 60% +9.5% -2.5% 5
Olivier Nicolai #847 ★★★ 75% +13.2% -14.1% 4
Scott Fidel #858 ★★★ 62% +0.7% -3.8% 29
Robert Cox CFA #890 ★★★ 62% +0.7% -6.8% 21
Caitlin Burrows #928 ★★★ 57% +0.1% -4.4% 35
Catherine O'Brien #934 ★★★ 58% +12.6% -1.7% 12
James Yaro #938 ★★★ 52% +1.3% -0.9% 25
Adam Bubes #949 ★★★ 50% +4.5% +0.1% 14
Jonathan Keypour #960 ★★★ 57% +9.1% -5.5% 7
Rajan Sharma #976 ★★★ 54% +8.7% -1.5% 13
Alexander Blostein #993 ★★★ 56% +1.2% -3662.3% 41
Thiago Bortoluci #1034 ★★★ 60% +9.2% -9.8% 5
Mohammed Moawalla #1058 ★★★ 75% +30.5% -11486.6% 4
Jan Hatzius #1095 ★★★ 60% -0.5% -16.5% 5
Adam Hotchkiss #1111 ★★★ 48% +7.6% +1.1% 21
Christine Cho #1139 ★★★ 52% +6.0% -1.2% 25
Mark Jordan, CFA #1162 ★★★ 50% -3.2% -9.0% 6
Richard Felton #1171 ★★★ 50% -1.5% -12.4% 4
Evie Koslosky #1200 ★★★ 58% -5.9% -10.3% 12
Shuhei Nakamura #1238 ★★★ 50% +1.1% -17.1% 4
Matthew Martino #1265 ★★★ 40% +1.0% -1.5% 10
Sahar Islam #1278 ★★★ 75% +29.3% -4.7% 4
Gabriela Borges #1279 ★★★ 57% +7.8% -2452.3% 51
Carly Davenport #1288 ★★★ 44% +1.4% -2.0% 27
Bruno Amorim #1295 ★★★ 47% +12.9% -0.8% 19
Simon Cheung #1306 ★★★ 44% +5.2% -5.0% 9
James Schneider #1319 ★★★ 62% +9.7% -2507.5% 72
Ajay Patel #1339 ★★★ 67% -13.8% -42.3% 3
Lincoln Kong #1356 ★★★ 33% -0.8% -6.4% 6
Yuichiro Isayama #1405 ★★★ 67% +12.8% -23.0% 9
Will Nance #1424 ★★★ 42% +5.3% +2.0% 33
Susan Maklari #1430 ★★★ 47% +4.1% -4.5% 36
Alexa Petrick #1478 ★★★ 25% -8.8% -14.4% 4
Brian K. Lee #1484 ★★★ 43% +9.3% -2230.9% 35
Ryan Nash #1518 ★★★ 63% -1.7% -10.9% 27
Bonnie Herzog #1539 ★★★ 47% +0.7% -6.9% 36
Michele Della Vigna #1559 ★★★ 75% +2.2% -12656.8% 8
Asad Haider #1578 ★★★ 38% -0.7% -4.8% 21
Manish Adukia #1602 ★★★ 33% -15.3% -40.6% 3
Atidrip Modak #1666 ★★★ 41% +3.4% -4.0% 32
Neil Mehta #1668 ★★★ 42% -0.1% -475.9% 57
Richard Law CFA #1705 ★★★ 46% +5.1% -8.3% 24
Benjamin Miller CFA #1708 ★★★ 40% -7.2% -22.3% 5
Leah Jordan #1719 ★★★ 35% +1.2% -5.6% 17
Noah Poponak #1722 ★★★ 49% -4.0% -9.1% 41
Thomas Wang #1735 ★★★ 33% +8.1% -1.4% 3
Sofie Peterzens #1739 ★★★ 25% -12.0% -29.3% 4
Adam Berlin #1767 ★★★ 60% -5.9% -19.4% 5
James Quigley #1772 ★★★ 43% -9.7% -21.6% 7
Tina Hou #1813 ★★ 29% -0.2% -17.1% 7
Corinne Johnson #1852 ★★ 62% -2.7% -12.3% 32
Vitor Tomita #1862 ★★ 33% -6.6% -20.1% 9
John Mackay #1878 ★★ 35% +0.8% -5.3% 23
Joe Ritchie #1882 ★★ 50% +3.0% -1629.8% 48
George Tong #1891 ★★ 41% +3.7% -4411.4% 41
Alberto Gandolfi #1904 ★★ 43% +9.3% -13742.5% 7
Tito Labarta #1915 ★★ 48% +4.2% -10.1% 27
Eric Sheridan #1924 ★★ 46% +1.3% -894.9% 74
Julien Blouin #1935 ★★ 31% -1.9% -6.9% 26
Salveen Richter #1953 ★★ 51% +0.7% -8.5% 67
Duffy Fischer #2019 ★★ 42% -4.2% -3527.5% 26
Timothy Zhao #2172 ★★ 25% -13.4% -22.6% 12
Ronald Keung #2186 ★★ 36% -9.2% -22.0% 14
Anthony Valentini #2322 ★★ 25% -19.5% -29.1% 12
Kate McShane #2366 41% -4.5% -1048.4% 70
Kash Rangan #2388 40% +1.3% -5283.4% 45
Mike Ng #2431 35% +0.8% -6.1% 66
Paul Choi #2508 33% -6.9% -4567.2% 39
Sho Kawano 0
Suhasini Varanasi 0% -4.5% -6.0% 1
Oliver Carruthers 0% -8.6% -16.8% 1
Christian Frenes 0
Makoto Kuroda 0
Andrew Baker 100% +37.1% +5.9% 2
Jonathan Kownator 0
Sam Burgess 0
Jorel Guilloty 0% -21.3% -33.0% 2
Michelle Cheng 50% +6.5% -8.4% 2
Trina Chen 0
Akinori Ueda 0% -18.1% -33.6% 2
Christian Hinderaker 0% -5.4% -6.7% 1
Minami Munakata 100% +34.4% +11.9% 2
Matt Greene 100% +74.5% +59.2% 1
Mikhail Butkov 100% +44.8% +25.6% 2
Ope Otaniyi 0
Hugo Nicolaci 0% -3.3% -8.5% 1
Aron Adamski 0% -9.3% -17.2% 1
Gabriel Simoes 100% +12.2% -2.5% 1
Takashi Miyazaki 0
Davinthra Thillainathan 0
Jacqueline Du 50% +49.9% +17.2% 2
Verena Jeng 50% +99.0% +43.0% 2
Takeru Adachi 0
🔒 The 6 highest-rated analysts at Goldman Sachs are Pro-only — this is where the real edge is. Reveal top 6

🔓 What 13Foresight Pro unlocks here

The 6 top-ranked analysts at Goldman Sachs, the firm's full 3- and 5-year track record, and firm-vs-firm rankings across Wall Street. Everything below the top 6, plus 1- and 2-year history, stays free — Pro is what keeps this independent research running and the servers paid for.

Upgrade to Pro

Disclaimer: Firm-level performance is calculated independently by 13Foresight by pooling the historical calls of analysts associated with this firm, measured against market prices. It may be incomplete or delayed, is for research purposes only, and is not investment advice.