Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Zevra Therapeutics Inc (ZVRA)

154 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ZVRA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +11
Streak
1Q ▲
Buyers last Q
63%

Smart Money Signals — ZVRA

Based on 156 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added ZVRA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (97% of max)

97% of all-time peak
156 hedge funds hold ZVRA right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +29% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+35 new funds entered over the past year (+29% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 63% buying

99 buying59 selling
Last quarter: 99 funds were net buyers (31 opened a brand new position + 68 added to an existing one). Only 59 were sellers (39 trimmed + 20 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+11 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new ZVRA position: 53 → 23 → 20 → 31. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

41% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 41% conviction (2yr+) ■ 33% medium ■ 26% new
64 out of 156 hedge funds have held ZVRA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +67% but shares only +8% — price-driven

Value
+66%
Shares
+8%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +67%, but actual share count only changed +8%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📊

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

23 → 53 → 23 → 20 → 31 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 53 → 23 → 20 → 31. ZVRA is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 48% veterans vs 36% newcomers

■ 48% veterans ■ 16% 1-2yr ■ 36% new
Entry-cohort mix of 165 holders: 79 (48%) are 2+ year veterans, 27 entered 1–2 years ago, and 59 (36%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 52% AUM from top-100 funds

52% from top-100 AUM funds
48 of 156 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 52% of total institutional value in ZVRA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.6
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — ZVRA

In 2026 Q2, 99 hedge funds were net buyers of ZVRA (31 opened a new position, 68 added to an existing one), while 59 reduced or exited (39 trimmed, 20 sold completely) — a 63% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. 52% of total institutional value in ZVRA is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +11 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 156.

Hedge Fund Ownership: ZVRA

How many hedge funds hold ZVRA — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of ZVRA vs. share price

Market Analysis: ZVRA

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: ZVRA

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

9 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
4.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.5
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: ZVRA
154 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in ZVRA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 154 145 6.21%
13F Shares 48M 44M 8.42%
Total Value $682M $409M 66.71%
New Positions 31 20 +11
Increased Positions 61 55 +6
Closed Positions 22 30 -8
Reduced Positions 39 50 -11
Total Calls 5 6 -16.67%
Total Puts 4 4 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.8 0.67 Neutral

Statistics: ZVRA

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

154 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ZVRA. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 ZVRA holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Retirement Planning Co of New England, Inc. 3.27% 634,410 $9.1M
2 Propel Bio Management, LLC 1.90% 253,544 $3.6M
3 Stonepine Capital Management, LLC 1.74% 258,701 $3.7M
4 Kingdon Capital Management, L.L.C. 1.14% 775,000 $11.1M
5 Mystic Asset Management, Inc. 1.08% 352,110 $5.0M
6 Nantahala Capital Management, LLC 0.86% 1,797,476 $25.8M
7 683 Capital Management, LLC 0.60% 855,000 $12.3M
8 Phocas Financial Corp. 0.59% 295,907 $4.2M
9 Globeflex Capital L P 0.35% 191,904 $2.8M
10 Diametric Capital, LP 0.35% 231,465 $3.3M
11 Element Squared LLC 0.33% 46,336 $664K
12 Woodline Partners LP 0.21% 4,785,771 $68.6M
13 Hennion & Walsh Asset Management, Inc. 0.16% 383,706 $5.5M
14 Caption Management, LLC 0.13% 2,002,800 $28.7M
15 IFG Advisors, LLC 0.12% 61,842 $887K
16 Kovack Advisors, Inc. 0.11% 171,151 $2.4M
17 Inspire Investing, LLC 0.10% 173,016 $2.5M
18 Royce & Associates LP 0.10% 882,658 $12.7M
19 Quaker Wealth Management, LLC 0.08% 19,367 $278K
20 Carret Asset Management, LLC 0.07% 58,300 $836K
21 Flputnam Investment Management Co 0.06% 348,824 $5.0M
22 Stratos Wealth Partners, LTD. 0.06% 408,000 $5.9M
23 Campbell & CO Investment Adviser LLC 0.05% 68,869 $988K
24 City State Bank 0.05% 13,798 $198K
25 Persistent Asset Partners Ltd 0.04% 8,499 $122K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Zevra Therapeutics Inc (ZVRA)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for ZVRA?

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added ZVRA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for ZVRA?

More buyers than sellers — 63% buying: Last quarter: 99 funds were net buyers (31 opened a brand new position + 68 added to an existing one). Only 59 were sellers (39 trimmed + 20 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for ZVRA holders?

Elite ownership — 52% AUM from top-100 funds: 48 of 156 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 52% of total institutional value in ZVRA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held ZVRA?

41% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 64 out of 156 hedge funds have held ZVRA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →