Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Zim Integrated Shipping Serv (ZIM)

259 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ZIM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +33
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
56%

Smart Money Signals — ZIM

Based on 259 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ZIM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
259 hedge funds hold ZIM right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +14% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+32 new funds entered over the past year (+14% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 56% buying

154 buying121 selling
Last quarter: 154 funds bought or added vs 121 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+30 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new ZIM position: 56 → 31 → 51 → 81. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

51% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 51% conviction (2yr+) ■ 22% medium ■ 28% new
131 out of 259 hedge funds have held ZIM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Price up while funds trimmed (+2% value, -20% shares)

Value
+1%
Shares
-20%
Last quarter: total value of institutional ZIM holdings rose +2% even though funds reduced share count by 20%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

45 → 56 → 31 → 51 → 81 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 56 → 31 → 51 → 81. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 58% veterans vs 30% newcomers

■ 58% veterans ■ 11% 1-2yr ■ 30% new
Entry-cohort mix of 289 holders: 168 (58%) are 2+ year veterans, 33 entered 1–2 years ago, and 88 (30%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅

Strong quality — 29% AUM from major funds

29% from top-100 AUM funds
38 of 252 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 29% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
3.8
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — ZIM

In 2026 Q1, 154 hedge funds were net buyers of ZIM (81 opened a new position, 73 added to an existing one), while 121 reduced or exited (73 trimmed, 48 sold completely) — a 56% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 29% of total institutional value in ZIM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +33 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 259.

Hedge Fund Ownership: ZIM

How many hedge funds hold ZIM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of ZIM vs. share price

Market Analysis: ZIM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: ZIM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Is It Too Late to Buy Zim Integrated Shipping Serv (ZIM) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Signal Freshness measures how much ZIM has moved relative to its sector benchmark (XLI) since the 2026 Q1 13F filing. A stock that has barely outrun its sector is still a relatively fresh entry point — the fund's thesis has not yet been priced in by the broader market.

Since Quarter End March 31, 2026 · 82d ago
ZIM
-7.6%
XLI
+11.9%

ZIM outperformed XLI by -19.5% since March 31, 2026.

Since 13F Filing Date May 15, 2026 · 37d ago
ZIM
-4.8%
XLI
+5.5%

Since the filing became public, ZIM outperformed XLI by -10.3% .

Interpretation: The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference. Learn more →

Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

19 top-rated funds 3 high-conviction
Consensus
5.6
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
3.3
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: ZIM
259 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in ZIM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 259 226 14.6%
13F Shares 61M 77M -20.42%
Total Value $1.57B $1.54B 1.89%
New Positions 81 51 +30
Increased Positions 63 62 +1
Closed Positions 48 48 -
Reduced Positions 70 75 -5
Total Calls 17 14 21.43%
Total Puts 20 16 25.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.18 1.14 Neutral

Statistics: ZIM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

259 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ZIM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 ZIM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Yelin Lapidot Holdings Management Ltd. 17.94% 3,268,773 $86.1M
2 Equitec Proprietary Markets, LLC 5.30% 376,700 $9.9M
3 Equitec Proprietary Markets, LLC 5.14% 364,700 $9.6M
4 Sagil Capital LLP 2.72% 271,475 $7.2M
5 Alpine Associates Management INC. 1.84% 1,181,300 $31.1M
6 Rangeley Capital, LLC 1.41% 55,000 $1.4M
7 Kennondale Capital Management LLC 1.38% 72,509 $1.9M
8 Soviero Asset Management, LP 1.32% 100,000 $2.6M
9 Oddo Bhf Asset Management Sas 1.19% 1,150,000 $30.3M
10 Hartree Partners, LP 1.13% 200,000 $5.3M
11 Meitav Investment House Ltd 1.13% 3,906,396 $102.9M
12 Y.D. More Investments Ltd 1.05% 1,019,873 $26.9M
13 One68 Global Capital, LLC 1.01% 11,882 $313K
14 Water Island Capital LLC 0.98% 331,800 $8.7M
15 Kintayl Capital LP 0.78% 57,088 $1.5M
16 Vision Financial Markets LLC 0.73% 28,300 $746K
17 Equitec Proprietary Markets, LLC 0.49% 35,000 $922K
18 Sphera Funds Management LTD. 0.44% 105,950 $2.8M
19 Chung Wu Investment Group, LLC 0.38% 16,900 $445K
20 NINE MASTS CAPITAL Ltd 0.34% 90,084 $2.4M
21 Autumn Glory Partners, LLC 0.33% 34,000 $896K
22 DME Capital Management, LP 0.29% 354,526 $9.3M
23 Mangrove Partners IM, LLC 0.29% 135,031 $3.6M
24 Causeway Capital Management LLC 0.29% 889,550 $23.4M
25 Harvest Management LLC 0.28% 21,800 $574K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Zim Integrated Shipping Serv (ZIM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for ZIM?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ZIM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for ZIM?

Slight buying edge — 56% buying: Last quarter: 154 funds bought or added vs 121 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for ZIM holders?

Strong quality — 29% AUM from major funds: 38 of 252 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 29% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held ZIM?

51% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 131 out of 259 hedge funds have held ZIM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Is it too late to buy Zim Integrated Shipping Serv (ZIM) following the 2026 Q1 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, ZIM has moved -4.8% since the 2026 Q1 13F filing date (May 15, 2026), compared to +5.5% for the XLI sector ETF — an outperformance of -10.3%. Since the quarter end (March 31, 2026), ZIM has gained -7.6% vs +11.9% for XLI. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →