Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Zim Integrated Shipping Serv (ZIM)

242 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ZIM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -11
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
48%

Smart Money Signals — ZIM

Based on 249 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their ZIM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (96% of max)

96% of all-time peak
249 hedge funds hold ZIM right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
〰️

Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year

fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding ZIM is almost the same as a year ago (-5 funds, -2% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 48% buying

130 buying140 selling
Last quarter: 140 funds reduced or exited vs 130 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-40 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 31 → 52 → 82 → 42. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

53% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 53% conviction (2yr+) ■ 19% medium ■ 27% new
133 out of 249 hedge funds have held ZIM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

57 → 31 → 52 → 82 → 42 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 31 → 52 → 82 → 42. A growing number of institutions are discovering ZIM each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 63% veterans vs 27% newcomers

■ 63% veterans ■ 10% 1-2yr ■ 27% new
Entry-cohort mix of 273 holders: 172 (63%) are 2+ year veterans, 26 entered 1–2 years ago, and 75 (27%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 48% AUM from top-100 funds

48% from top-100 AUM funds
40 of 243 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 48% of total institutional value in ZIM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.7
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — ZIM

In 2026 Q2, 130 hedge funds were net buyers of ZIM (42 opened a new position, 88 added to an existing one), while 140 reduced or exited (87 trimmed, 53 sold completely) — a 48% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. 48% of total institutional value in ZIM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -11 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 249.

Hedge Fund Ownership: ZIM

How many hedge funds hold ZIM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of ZIM vs. share price

Market Analysis: ZIM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: ZIM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

13 top-rated funds 2 high-conviction
Consensus
5.0
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
3.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: ZIM
242 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in ZIM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 242 260 -6.92%
13F Shares 59M 61M -3.24%
Total Value $1.49B $1.57B -5.0%
New Positions 42 82 -40
Increased Positions 81 63 +18
Closed Positions 54 49 +5
Reduced Positions 79 70 +9
Total Calls 15 17 -11.76%
Total Puts 15 20 -25.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 1.18 Neutral

Statistics: ZIM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

242 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ZIM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 ZIM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Yelin Lapidot Holdings Management Ltd. 16.31% 3,308,773 $86.0M
2 Sagil Capital LLP 6.08% 655,171 $17.0M
3 Equitec Proprietary Markets, LLC 3.90% 839,300 $21.8M
4 Equitec Proprietary Markets, LLC 3.37% 724,500 $18.8M
5 Alpine Associates Management INC. 1.52% 935,949 $24.3M
6 Kennondale Capital Management LLC 1.42% 81,691 $2.1M
7 Oddo Bhf Asset Management Sas 1.38% 1,150,000 $29.9M
8 Rangeley Capital, LLC 1.24% 52,000 $1.4M
9 Kintayl Capital LP 0.93% 89,547 $2.3M
10 Meitav Investment House Ltd 0.92% 5,481,537 $137.3M
11 Cannon Global Investment Management, LLC 0.74% 10,000 $260K
12 Fieldview Capital Management, LLC 0.58% 77,616 $2.0M
13 Carolina Wealth Management Inc 0.53% 44,513 $1.2M
14 JT Stratford LLC 0.30% 104,760 $2.7M
15 NINE MASTS CAPITAL Ltd 0.27% 103,084 $2.7M
16 MRP Capital Investments, LLC 0.25% 12,800 $333K
17 Mangrove Partners IM, LLC 0.23% 135,031 $3.5M
18 AQR Arbitrage LLC 0.23% 613,986 $16.0M
19 Connecticut Capital Management Group, LLC 0.21% 9,878 $257K
20 Causeway Capital Management LLC 0.20% 694,474 $18.1M
21 Menora Mivtachim Holdings LTD. 0.17% 1,656,810 $43.1M
22 Bright Futures Wealth Management, LLC. 0.16% 9,486 $247K
23 Autumn Glory Partners, LLC 0.15% 21,000 $546K
24 MBE Wealth Management, LLC 0.15% 16,241 $422K
25 Plan Group Financial, LLC 0.15% 27,590 $717K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Zim Integrated Shipping Serv (ZIM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for ZIM?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their ZIM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for ZIM?

More sellers than buyers — 48% buying: Last quarter: 140 funds reduced or exited vs 130 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for ZIM holders?

Elite ownership — 48% AUM from top-100 funds: 40 of 243 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 48% of total institutional value in ZIM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held ZIM?

53% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 133 out of 249 hedge funds have held ZIM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →