Based on 9 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their ZIG positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 82% of 3.0Y peak
82% of all-time peak
9 funds currently hold this stock — 82% of the 3.0-year high of 11 funds (reached 2024 Q3). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 10% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
1 fewer hedge funds hold ZIG compared to a year ago (-10% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 40% buying
4 buying6 selling
Last quarter: 6 funds reduced or exited vs 4 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~0 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 0 → 2 → 0. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
89% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 89% conviction (2yr+)
■ 11% medium
■ 0% new
8 out of 9 hedge funds have held ZIG for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~0 new funds/quarter
0 → 0 → 0 → 2 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 0 → 2 → 0. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Deep conviction — 78% of holders stayed 2+ years
■ 78% veterans
■ 22% 1-2yr
■ 0% new
Of 9 current holders: 7 (78%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 1% AUM from top-100
1% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 9 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 1% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.