Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Yum Brands Inc (YUM)

1K + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in YUM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +7
Streak
3Q ▲
Buyers last Q
50%

Smart Money Signals — YUM

Based on 1447 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added YUM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
1,447 hedge funds hold YUM right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +9% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+120 new funds entered over the past year (+9% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 50% buying

649 buying641 selling
Last quarter: 649 funds bought or added vs 641 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-8 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 105 → 191 → 161 → 153. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

70% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 70% conviction (2yr+) ■ 15% medium ■ 16% new
1,010 out of 1,447 hedge funds have held YUM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +44%, value +16%

Value
+16%
Shares
+43%
Last quarter: funds added +44% more shares while total portfolio value only changed +16%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~153 new funds/quarter

124 → 105 → 191 → 161 → 153 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 105 → 191 → 161 → 153. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 72% veterans vs 17% newcomers

■ 72% veterans ■ 10% 1-2yr ■ 17% new
Entry-cohort mix of 1,475 holders: 1,068 (72%) are 2+ year veterans, 153 entered 1–2 years ago, and 254 (17%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 67% AUM from top-100 funds

67% from top-100 AUM funds
67 of 1440 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 67% of total institutional value in YUM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.5
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — YUM

In 2026 Q2, 649 hedge funds were net buyers of YUM (153 opened a new position, 496 added to an existing one), while 641 reduced or exited (495 trimmed, 146 sold completely) — a 50% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 3 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 67% of total institutional value in YUM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +7 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 1447.

Hedge Fund Ownership: YUM

How many hedge funds hold YUM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of YUM vs. share price

Market Analysis: YUM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: YUM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Broad Consensus, Selective Conviction

Many quality funds hold this stock, but top-tier positions remain relatively small.

46 top-rated funds 5 high-conviction
Consensus
7.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
3.4
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: YUM
1K + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in YUM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 1426 1440 -0.97%
13F Shares 246M 221M 11.49%
Total Value $36.70B $32.01B 14.64%
New Positions 149 161 -12
Increased Positions 488 543 -55
Closed Positions 156 112 +44
Reduced Positions 480 404 +76
Total Calls 18 18 -
Total Puts 16 21 -23.81%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.89 1.17 Neutral

Statistics: YUM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

1K + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in YUM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 YUM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Camrose Capital Investment Partners LLP 8.69% 481,103 $76.9M
2 Formuepleje A/S 5.71% 644,236 $48.6M
3 Lrz Capital LLC 4.23% 52,175 $8.3M
4 Sustainable Growth Advisers, LP 3.92% 2,498,040 $399.3M
5 Mane Global Capital Management LP 3.89% 294,217 $47.0M
6 Ilex Capital Partners (UK) LLP 3.33% 1,016,155 $162.4M
7 Paralel Advisors LLC 2.62% 425,000 $67.9M
8 Pavion Blue Capital, LLC 2.34% 36,407 $5.8M
9 Conscious Wealth Investments, LLC 2.09% 27,670 $4.1M
10 Cantillon Capital Management LLC 2.01% 83,427 $13.3M
11 Northern Right Capital Management, L.P. 1.90% 40,000 $6.4M
12 Ketron Financial 1.72% 34,733 $5.6M
13 Platinum Investment Management Ltd 1.57% 39,847 $6.4M
14 Horrell Capital Management, Inc. 1.52% 20,864 $3.3M
15 Enterprise Financial Services Corp 1.50% 23,019 $3.7M
16 Magellan Asset Management Ltd 1.28% 358,827 $57.4M
17 Bristol John W & Co Inc /Ny/ 1.25% 527,241 $84.3M
18 Anchor Capital Advisors LLC 1.23% 272,698 $43.6M
19 Eukles Asset Management 1.21% 18,341 $2.9M
20 NS Partners Ltd 1.17% 171,184 $27.4M
21 Zwj Investment Counsel Inc 1.10% 212,440 $34.0M
22 ICW Investment Advisors LLC 1.08% 19,254 $3.1M
23 Searle & CO. 0.97% 26,940 $4.3M
24 Impact Investors, Inc 0.88% 7,500 $1.2M
25 Buckhead Capital Management LLC 0.87% 15,862 $2.5M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Yum Brands Inc (YUM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for YUM?

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row: For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added YUM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for YUM?

Slight buying edge — 50% buying: Last quarter: 649 funds bought or added vs 641 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for YUM holders?

Elite ownership — 67% AUM from top-100 funds: 67 of 1440 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 67% of total institutional value in YUM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held YUM?

70% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 1,010 out of 1,447 hedge funds have held YUM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →