Based on 2 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their YASKY positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 50% of 3.0Y high
50% of all-time peak
Only 2 funds hold YASKY today versus a peak of 4 funds at 2023 Q4 — just 50% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 50% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
2 fewer hedge funds hold YASKY compared to a year ago (-50% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 25% buying
1 buying3 selling
Last quarter: 3 funds sold vs only 1 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~0 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 0 → 2 → 0. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
100% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 100% conviction (2yr+)
■ 0% medium
■ 0% new
2 out of 2 hedge funds have held YASKY for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~0 new funds/quarter
1 → 0 → 0 → 2 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 0 → 2 → 0. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 100% veterans vs 0% newcomers
■ 100% veterans
■ 0% 1-2yr
■ 0% new
Entry-cohort mix of 2 holders: 2 (100%) are 2+ year veterans, 0 entered 1–2 years ago, and 0 (0%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 21% AUM from major funds
21% from top-100 AUM funds
1 of 2 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 21% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 1.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.