Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Spdr Series Trust (XPH)

94 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in XPH. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +13
Streak
4Q ▲
Buyers last Q
55%

Smart Money Signals — XPH

Based on 95 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added XPH than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
95 hedge funds hold XPH right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +46% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+30 new funds entered over the past year (+46% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 55% buying

51 buying42 selling
Last quarter: 51 funds bought or added vs 42 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+8 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new XPH position: 12 → 15 → 18 → 26. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

59% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 59% conviction (2yr+) ■ 15% medium ■ 26% new
56 out of 95 hedge funds have held XPH for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Price up while funds trimmed (+13% value, -10% shares)

Value
+13%
Shares
-9%
Last quarter: total value of institutional XPH holdings rose +13% even though funds reduced share count by 10%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

6 → 12 → 15 → 18 → 26 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 12 → 15 → 18 → 26. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 72% veterans vs 24% newcomers

■ 72% veterans ■ 4% 1-2yr ■ 24% new
Entry-cohort mix of 97 holders: 70 (72%) are 2+ year veterans, 4 entered 1–2 years ago, and 23 (24%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 60% AUM from top-100 funds

60% from top-100 AUM funds
20 of 94 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 60% of total institutional value in XPH. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.2
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.2/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — XPH

In 2026 Q2, 51 hedge funds were net buyers of XPH (26 opened a new position, 25 added to an existing one), while 42 reduced or exited (29 trimmed, 13 sold completely) — a 55% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 4 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 60% of total institutional value in XPH is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +13 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 95.

Hedge Fund Ownership: XPH

How many hedge funds hold XPH — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of XPH vs. share price

Market Analysis: XPH

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: XPH

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

3 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
2.6
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.2
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: XPH
2026 Q3 Stats Unlock in 45 days 94 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in XPH. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 94 82 14.63%
13F Shares 4M 4M -9.72%
Total Value $267M $236M 13.06%
New Positions 26 18 +8
Increased Positions 25 27 -2
Closed Positions 13 11 +2
Reduced Positions 29 19 +10
Total Calls 1 1 -
Total Puts 2 1 100.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 2.0 1.0 Bearish

Statistics: XPH

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

94 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in XPH. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 XPH holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Measured Wealth Private Client Group, LLC 1.09% 68,306 $4.5M
2 Compass Wealth Management LLC 0.33% 26,652 $1.8M
3 Kingsview Wealth Management, LLC 0.25% 314,894 $20.9M
4 First Citizens Bank & Trust Co 0.19% 195,701 $13.0M
5 Svb Wealth LLC 0.18% 42,797 $2.8M
6 Wharton Business Group, LLC 0.10% 46,395 $3.1M
7 Vista Investment Management 0.08% 3,986 $264K
8 Advantage Trust Co 0.08% 3,250 $215K
9 Envestnet Portfolio Solutions, Inc. 0.06% 180,521 $12.0M
10 Gts Securities LLC 0.04% 26,885 $1.8M
11 J. Goldman & Co LP 0.03% 16,200 $1.1M
12 Lifeworks Advisors, LLC 0.03% 3,794 $251K
13 Fragasso Financial Advisors Inc 0.02% 6,699 $444K
14 Evelyn Partners Group Ltd 0.02% 71,806 $10.5M
15 Avior Wealth Management, LLC 0.02% 12,070 $800K
16 SummitTX Capital, L.P. 0.02% 11,745 $778K
17 Private Advisor Group, LLC 0.02% 63,697 $4.2M
18 Caitlin John, LLC 0.02% 500 $33K
19 Clark Capital Management Group, Inc. 0.01% 32,929 $2.2M
20 Sigma Planning Corp 0.01% 6,088 $403K
21 MAI Capital Management 0.01% 31,119 $2.1M
22 Institute for Wealth Management, LLC. 0.01% 1,297 $86K
23 Lanark Financial, INC. 0.01% 1,557 $103K
24 Arax Advisory Partners 0.01% 15,179 $1.0M
25 Ameritas Advisory Services, LLC 0.01% 4,939 $327K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Spdr Series Trust (XPH)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for XPH?

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row: For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added XPH than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for XPH?

Slight buying edge — 55% buying: Last quarter: 51 funds bought or added vs 42 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for XPH holders?

Elite ownership — 60% AUM from top-100 funds: 20 of 94 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 60% of total institutional value in XPH. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held XPH?

59% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 56 out of 95 hedge funds have held XPH for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →