Based on 70 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added XMAR than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊
High ownership — 93% of 3.0Y peak
93% of all-time peak
70 funds currently hold this stock — 93% of the 3.0-year high of 75 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding XMAR is almost the same as a year ago (+0 funds, +0% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 32% buying
21 buying44 selling
Last quarter: 44 funds sold vs only 21 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+6 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new XMAR position: 11 → 12 → 2 → 8. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒
51% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 51% conviction (2yr+)
■ 34% medium
■ 14% new
36 out of 70 hedge funds have held XMAR for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
⚠️
Saturation — most institutions already know this story
18 → 11 → 12 → 2 → 8 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 11 → 12 → 2 → 8. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
🏛️
Deep conviction — 51% of holders stayed 2+ years
■ 51% veterans
■ 23% 1-2yr
■ 26% new
Of 70 current holders: 36 (51%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 9% AUM from top-100
9% from top-100 AUM funds
7 of 70 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 9% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.