Based on 69 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their XMAR positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 92% of 3.0Y peak
92% of all-time peak
69 funds currently hold this stock — 92% of the 3.0-year high of 75 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 4% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
3 fewer hedge funds hold XMAR compared to a year ago (-4% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 32% buying
20 buying43 selling
Last quarter: 43 funds sold vs only 20 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~10 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 12 → 2 → 8 → 10. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
55% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 55% conviction (2yr+)
■ 25% medium
■ 20% new
38 out of 69 hedge funds have held XMAR for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~10 new funds/quarter
11 → 12 → 2 → 8 → 10 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 12 → 2 → 8 → 10. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 54% veterans vs 23% newcomers
■ 54% veterans
■ 23% 1-2yr
■ 23% new
Entry-cohort mix of 69 holders: 37 (54%) are 2+ year veterans, 16 entered 1–2 years ago, and 16 (23%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 10% AUM from top-100
10% from top-100 AUM funds
11 of 69 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 10% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
4.0
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.0/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.