Based on 30 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their XJAN positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 88% of 3.0Y peak
88% of all-time peak
30 funds currently hold this stock — 88% of the 3.0-year high of 34 funds (reached 2024 Q3). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶
Steady growth — +7% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+2 new funds entered over the past year (+7% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 15% buying
5 buying28 selling
Last quarter: 28 funds sold vs only 5 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 6 → 3 → 6 → 3. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔄
Mostly new holders — 17% entered in last year
■ 3% conviction (2yr+)
■ 80% medium
■ 17% new
Only 1 funds (3%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~3 new funds/quarter
5 → 6 → 3 → 6 → 3 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 6 → 3 → 6 → 3. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 7% veterans, 17% new entrants
■ 7% veterans
■ 77% 1-2yr
■ 17% new
Of 30 current holders: 2 (7%) held 2+ years, 23 held 1–2 years, 5 (17%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 4% AUM from top-100
4% from top-100 AUM funds
4 of 30 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 4% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
4.7
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.7/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.