Based on 100 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row
For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added WWJD than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
100 hedge funds hold WWJD right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +25% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+20 new funds entered over the past year (+25% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 73% buying
72 buying26 selling
Last quarter: 72 funds were net buyers (19 opened a brand new position + 53 added to an existing one). Only 26 were sellers (19 trimmed + 7 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+9 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new WWJD position: 18 → 11 → 10 → 19. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒
48% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 48% conviction (2yr+)
■ 25% medium
■ 27% new
48 out of 100 hedge funds have held WWJD for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~19 new funds/quarter
18 → 18 → 11 → 10 → 19 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 18 → 11 → 10 → 19. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Deep conviction — 48% of holders stayed 2+ years
■ 48% veterans
■ 14% 1-2yr
■ 38% new
Of 100 current holders: 48 (48%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 6% AUM from top-100
6% from top-100 AUM funds
9 of 100 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 6% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.