Based on 249 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their WLDN positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (95% of max)
95% of all-time peak
249 hedge funds hold WLDN right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +46% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+79 new funds entered over the past year (+46% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 52% buying
150 buying137 selling
Last quarter: 150 funds bought or added vs 137 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-10 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 36 → 88 → 58 → 48. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
📌
Mixed — 37% long-term, 37% new
■ 37% conviction (2yr+)
■ 26% medium
■ 37% new
Of the 249 current holders: 93 (37%) held >2 years, 64 held 1–2 years, and 92 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +2%, value -27%
Last quarter: funds added +2% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -27%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~48 new funds/quarter
32 → 36 → 88 → 58 → 48 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 36 → 88 → 58 → 48. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 45% veterans vs 41% newcomers
■ 45% veterans
■ 14% 1-2yr
■ 41% new
Entry-cohort mix of 257 holders: 115 (45%) are 2+ year veterans, 36 entered 1–2 years ago, and 106 (41%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 29% AUM from major funds
29% from top-100 AUM funds
47 of 249 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 29% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
4.2
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.2/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.