Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

United Sts Lime & Minerals I (USLM)

228 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in USLM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -3
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
55%

Smart Money Signals — USLM

Based on 231 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their USLM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (99% of max)

99% of all-time peak
231 hedge funds hold USLM right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +24% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+44 new funds entered over the past year (+24% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 55% buying

142 buying114 selling
Last quarter: 142 funds bought or added vs 114 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~47 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 53 → 31 → 43 → 47. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

42% of holders stayed for 2+ years

42% conviction (2yr+) 29% medium 29% new
98 out of 231 hedge funds have held USLM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +23%, value -8%

Value
-7%
Shares
+22%
Last quarter: funds added +23% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -8%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~47 new funds/quarter

30 → 53 → 31 → 43 → 47 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 53 → 31 → 43 → 47. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 42% veterans vs 33% newcomers

42% veterans 25% 1-2yr 33% new
Entry-cohort mix of 235 holders: 98 (42%) are 2+ year veterans, 59 entered 1–2 years ago, and 78 (33%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 58% AUM from top-100 funds

58% from top-100 AUM funds
48 of 230 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 58% of total institutional value in USLM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — USLM

In 2026 Q2, 142 hedge funds were net buyers of USLM (47 opened a new position, 95 added to an existing one), while 114 reduced or exited (64 trimmed, 50 sold completely) — a 55% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. 58% of total institutional value in USLM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -3 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 231.

Hedge Fund Ownership: USLM

How many hedge funds hold USLM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of USLM vs. share price

Market Analysis: USLM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: USLM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

11 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
4.7
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.4
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: USLM
228 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in USLM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 228 234 -2.56%
13F Shares 9M 9M 8.14%
Total Value $966M $1.06B -9.04%
New Positions 47 43 +4
Increased Positions 92 69 +23
Closed Positions 52 28 +24
Reduced Positions 63 82 -19
Total Calls 2 2 -
Total Puts 2 1 100.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 0.5 Neutral

Statistics: USLM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

228 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in USLM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 USLM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Davidson Capital Management Inc. 0.73% 43,572 $4.6M
2 Cardinal Capital Management 0.56% 44,576 $4.7M
3 Seneca House Advisors 0.54% 14,614 $1.5M
4 Yorktown Management & Research Co Inc 0.40% 6,225 $652K
5 ArrowMark Colorado Holdings LLC 0.35% 79,832 $8.4M
6 Congruence Capital, LLC 0.34% 12,497 $1.3M
7 nVerses Capital, LLC 0.32% 1,982 $207K
8 AM Investment Strategies LLC 0.30% 15,000 $1.6M
9 Select Equity Group, L.P. 0.20% 380,570 $39.8M
10 Linden Thomas Advisory Services, LLC 0.19% 22,505 $2.4M
11 Royce & Associates LP 0.19% 220,563 $23.1M
12 North Star Investment Management Corp. 0.19% 32,550 $3.4M
13 Kaizen Financial Strategies 0.17% 4,953 $525K
14 Thompson Davis & CO., INC. 0.16% 2,525 $264K
15 Moran Wealth Management, LLC 0.11% 36,970 $3.9M
16 Algert Global LLC 0.10% 81,920 $8.6M
17 Round Rock Advisors LLC 0.10% 7,335 $768K
18 Dynamic Technology Lab Private Ltd 0.09% 3,940 $412K
19 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.09% 609,011 $63.7M
20 James Investment Research, INC. 0.08% 7,966 $834K
21 Advisors Asset Management, Inc. 0.08% 51,305 $5.4M
22 Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLC 0.08% 61,103 $6.4M
23 Schwartz Investment Counsel Inc 0.07% 20,123 $2.1M
24 Diamond Hill Capital Management, LLC (Investment Advisor) 0.06% 75,095 $7.9M
25 Dark Forest Capital Management LP 0.05% 8,074 $845K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — United Sts Lime & Minerals I (USLM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for USLM?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their USLM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for USLM?

Slight buying edge — 55% buying: Last quarter: 142 funds bought or added vs 114 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for USLM holders?

Elite ownership — 58% AUM from top-100 funds: 48 of 230 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 58% of total institutional value in USLM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held USLM?

42% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 98 out of 231 hedge funds have held USLM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →