Based on 22 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added UHGWW than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 67% of 3.0Y high
67% of all-time peak
Only 22 funds hold UHGWW today versus a peak of 33 funds at 2023 Q2 — just 67% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +47% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+7 new funds entered over the past year (+47% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 80% buying
8 buying2 selling
Last quarter: 8 funds were net buyers (8 opened a brand new position + 0 added to an existing one). Only 2 were sellers (2 trimmed + 0 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+8 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new UHGWW position: 3 → 1 → 0 → 8. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒
55% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 55% conviction (2yr+)
■ 14% medium
■ 32% new
12 out of 22 hedge funds have held UHGWW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -11%, value -49%
Last quarter: funds added -11% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -49%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~8 new funds/quarter
0 → 3 → 1 → 0 → 8 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 3 → 1 → 0 → 8. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 59% veterans vs 32% newcomers
■ 59% veterans
■ 9% 1-2yr
■ 32% new
Entry-cohort mix of 22 holders: 13 (59%) are 2+ year veterans, 2 entered 1–2 years ago, and 7 (32%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 12% AUM from top-100
12% from top-100 AUM funds
3 of 20 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 12% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.4/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.