Based on 556 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their TW positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (96% of max)
96% of all-time peak
556 hedge funds hold TW right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding TW is almost the same as a year ago (-9 funds, -2% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 49% buying
298 buying312 selling
Last quarter: 312 funds reduced or exited vs 298 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-27 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 90 → 101 → 100 → 73. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒
58% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 58% conviction (2yr+)
■ 22% medium
■ 20% new
320 out of 556 hedge funds have held TW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +19%, value -15%
Last quarter: funds added +19% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -15%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~73 new funds/quarter
88 → 90 → 101 → 100 → 73 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 90 → 101 → 100 → 73. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 62% veterans vs 24% newcomers
■ 62% veterans
■ 14% 1-2yr
■ 24% new
Entry-cohort mix of 564 holders: 351 (62%) are 2+ year veterans, 77 entered 1–2 years ago, and 136 (24%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 51% AUM from top-100 funds
51% from top-100 AUM funds
67 of 554 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 51% of total institutional value in TW. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 3.4/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.