Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Texas Pacific Land Corporati (TPL)

851 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in TPL. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +138
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
61%

Smart Money Signals — TPL

Based on 858 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added TPL than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
858 hedge funds hold TPL right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +15% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+113 new funds entered over the past year (+15% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying

485 buying315 selling
Last quarter: 485 funds were net buyers (199 opened a brand new position + 286 added to an existing one). Only 315 were sellers (254 trimmed + 61 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+99 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new TPL position: 82 → 73 → 100 → 199. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

49% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 49% conviction (2yr+) ■ 25% medium ■ 26% new
421 out of 858 hedge funds have held TPL for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +68% but shares only +8% — price-driven

Value
+68%
Shares
+7%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +68%, but actual share count only changed +8%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

125 → 82 → 73 → 100 → 199 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 82 → 73 → 100 → 199. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 54% veterans vs 28% newcomers

■ 54% veterans ■ 18% 1-2yr ■ 28% new
Entry-cohort mix of 888 holders: 479 (54%) are 2+ year veterans, 157 entered 1–2 years ago, and 252 (28%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅

Strong quality — 29% AUM from major funds

29% from top-100 AUM funds
60 of 855 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 29% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
3.8
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — TPL

In 2026 Q1, 485 hedge funds were net buyers of TPL (199 opened a new position, 286 added to an existing one), while 315 reduced or exited (254 trimmed, 61 sold completely) — a 61% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 29% of total institutional value in TPL is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +138 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 858.

Hedge Fund Ownership: TPL

How many hedge funds hold TPL — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of TPL vs. share price

Market Analysis: TPL

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: TPL

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Is It Too Late to Buy Texas Pacific Land Corporati (TPL) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Signal Freshness measures how much TPL has moved relative to its sector benchmark (XLE) since the 2026 Q1 13F filing. A stock that has barely outrun its sector is still a relatively fresh entry point — the fund's thesis has not yet been priced in by the broader market.

Since Quarter End March 31, 2026 · 83d ago
TPL
-25.3%
XLE
-12.2%

TPL outperformed XLE by -13.1% since March 31, 2026.

Since 13F Filing Date May 15, 2026 · 38d ago
TPL
-7.9%
XLE
-9.5%

Since the filing became public, TPL outperformed XLE by +1.6% .

Interpretation: The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference. Learn more →

Smart Money Signal ?
Broad Consensus, Selective Conviction

Many quality funds hold this stock, but top-tier positions remain relatively small.

49 top-rated funds 23 high-conviction
Consensus
7.4
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
4.7
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: TPL
851 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in TPL. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 851 720 18.19%
13F Shares 54M 50M 7.49%
Total Value $24.12B $14.34B 68.16%
New Positions 195 100 +95
Increased Positions 283 602 -319
Closed Positions 64 78 -14
Reduced Positions 244 13 +231
Total Calls 17 7 142.86%
Total Puts 15 7 114.29%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.88 1.0 Neutral

Statistics: TPL

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

851 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in TPL. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 TPL holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 York GP, Ltd. 99.82% 268,600 $127.5M
2 SoftVest Advisors, LLC 57.80% 1,062,099 $504.0M
3 Horizon Kinetics Asset Management LLC 51.49% 10,015,379 $4.75B
4 Mad River Investors 48.69% 285,120 $135.3M
5 Msrh, LLC 48.16% 150,230 $43.1M
6 Lagoda Investment Management, L.P. 25.23% 86,225 $40.9M
7 SoftVest Advisors, LLC 22.26% 409,100 $194.1M
8 Atlas Wealth Partners, LLC 19.45% 39,849 $18.9M
9 Lawson Kroeker Investment Management Inc/Ne 15.62% 112,895 $53.6M
10 First Dallas Securities Inc. 10.46% 59,555 $28.3M
11 EagleClaw Capital Managment, LLC 10.09% 151,894 $72.1M
12 Pacific Heights Asset Management LLC 9.85% 620,000 $294.2M
13 One Charles Private Wealth Services, LLC 8.97% 75,565 $35.9M
14 Wallace Hart LLC 7.85% 12,010 $5.7M
15 Schwartz Investment Counsel Inc 6.93% 410,926 $195.0M
16 Resolute Capital Asset Partners LLC 6.37% 25,500 $12.1M
17 Redwood Family Wealth LLC 6.31% 13,615 $6.5M
18 Promethium Advisors,LLC 5.53% 22,516 $10.7M
19 NCM Capital Management, LLC 5.04% 29,659 $14.1M
20 Lunt Capital Management, Inc. 4.50% 24,675 $11.7M
21 Hodges Capital Management Inc. 4.14% 105,315 $50.0M
22 TMB Capital Partners, LLC 3.60% 22,538 $10.7M
23 Fielder Capital Group LLC 3.58% 34,604 $16.4M
24 Moors & Cabot, Inc. 3.46% 170,484 $80.9M
25 Bulldog Investors, LLP 3.41% 32,000 $15.2M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Texas Pacific Land Corporati (TPL)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for TPL?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added TPL than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for TPL?

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying: Last quarter: 485 funds were net buyers (199 opened a brand new position + 286 added to an existing one). Only 315 were sellers (254 trimmed + 61 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for TPL holders?

Strong quality — 29% AUM from major funds: 60 of 855 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 29% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held TPL?

49% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 421 out of 858 hedge funds have held TPL for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Is it too late to buy Texas Pacific Land Corporati (TPL) following the 2026 Q1 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, TPL has moved -7.9% since the 2026 Q1 13F filing date (May 15, 2026), compared to -9.5% for the XLE sector ETF — an outperformance of +1.6%. Since the quarter end (March 31, 2026), TPL has gained -25.3% vs -12.2% for XLE. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →