Based on 15 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their TOMZ positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 79% of 3.0Y peak
79% of all-time peak
15 funds currently hold this stock — 79% of the 3.0-year high of 19 funds (reached 2024 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 21% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
4 fewer hedge funds hold TOMZ compared to a year ago (-21% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 31% buying
4 buying9 selling
Last quarter: 9 funds sold vs only 4 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 1 → 3 → 2 → 3. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
67% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 67% conviction (2yr+)
■ 13% medium
■ 20% new
10 out of 15 hedge funds have held TOMZ for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -2%, value -31%
Last quarter: funds added -2% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -31%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~3 new funds/quarter
3 → 1 → 3 → 2 → 3 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 1 → 3 → 2 → 3. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 67% veterans vs 20% newcomers
■ 67% veterans
■ 13% 1-2yr
■ 20% new
Entry-cohort mix of 15 holders: 10 (67%) are 2+ year veterans, 2 entered 1–2 years ago, and 3 (20%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 21% AUM from major funds
21% from top-100 AUM funds
6 of 15 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 21% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 3.4/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.