TILLY'S CL A ORD (TLYS): Hedge Fund Ownership & Smart Money Signals (Q4 2025)

TILLY'S CL A ORD (TLYS)

55 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in TLYS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Smart Money Signals — TLYS

Based on 53 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q

For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their TLYS positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

🔻

Below peak — only 69% of 3.0Y high

69% of all-time peak

Only 53 funds hold TLYS today versus a peak of 77 funds at 2023 Q2 — just 69% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.

📉

Outflows — 12% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q

7 fewer hedge funds hold TLYS compared to a year ago (-12% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.

🔴

Heavy selling pressure — only 37% buying

18 buying31 selling

Last quarter: 31 funds sold vs only 18 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-6 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter

Funds opening this position for the first time: 6 → 18 → 9 → 3. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.

🔒

75% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 75% conviction (2yr+) ■ 8% medium ■ 17% new

40 out of 53 hedge funds have held TLYS for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

⚠️

Saturation — most institutions already know this story

2 → 6 → 18 → 9 → 3 new funds/Q

New funds entering each quarter: 6 → 18 → 9 → 3. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.

🏛️

Deep conviction — 82% of holders stayed 2+ years

■ 82% veterans ■ 2% 1-2yr ■ 16% new

Of 55 current holders: 45 (82%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.

📋

Smaller funds dominant — 11% AUM from top-100

11% from top-100 AUM funds

13 of 53 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 11% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

2.5

out of 10

Low Exit Risk

Exit risk score 2.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Metric	All 13F Filers (2025 Q4)	Prior (2025 Q3)	Change
Funds Holding	55	59	-6.78%
13F Shares	21M	21M	-0.93%
Total Value	$42M	$44M	-4.29%
New Positions	3	9	-6
Increased Positions	16	14	+2
Closed Positions	7	7	-
Reduced Positions	25	25	-
Total Calls	2	2	-
Total Puts	0	0	-
PUT/CALL Ratio	0.0	0.0	Bullish

Metric

All 13F Filers (2025 Q4)

Prior (2025 Q3)

Change

Funds Holding

-6.78%

13F Shares

21M

-0.93%

Total Value

$42M

$44M

-4.29%

New Positions

-6

Increased Positions

Closed Positions

Reduced Positions

Total Calls

Total Puts

PUT/CALL Ratio

0.0

Bullish

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

55 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in TLYS. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

FILTER:All New Added To Reduced No Change | Overweight >5% | SHOW: Active managers + show index funds

Top 8 institutional holders of TLYS — 2025 Q4 · Source: SEC Form 13F
#	Investor	% of Portfolio	Shares	Mkt Value
1	AFG FIDUCIARY SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP	0.10%	40,000	$176K
2	FNY Investment Advisers, LLC	0.04%	23,165	—
3	Kathmere Capital Management, LLC	0.01%	50,000	$202K
4	Abel Hall, LLC	0.01%	13,680	$55K
5	SG Americas Securities, LLC	0.00%	220,095	—
6	Sequoia Financial Advisors, LLC	0.00%	12,039	$49K
7	SBI Securities Co., Ltd.	0.00%	394	$2K
8	NISA INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC	0.00%	437	$2K

Investor	Ownership History	% of Portfolio	Prev %	Rank	Conviction	Avg Buy Price	13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y	Sell Timing	Shares	Mkt Value	Change	Change %	Source	Quarter	Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — TILLY'S CL A ORD (TLYS)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for TLYS?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their TLYS positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for TLYS?

Heavy selling pressure — only 37% buying: Last quarter: 31 funds sold vs only 18 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

What is the fund quality score for TLYS holders?

Smaller funds dominant — 11% AUM from top-100: 13 of 53 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 11% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

How long have hedge funds held TLYS?

75% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 40 out of 53 hedge funds have held TLYS for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Market Cap	--
Enterprise Value	--
Trailing P/E	--
Forward P/E	--
PEG Ratio (5yr expected)	--
Price/Sales (ttm)	--
Price/Book (mrq)	--
Enterprise Value/Revenue	--
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	--
Beta (5Y Monthly)	--
Short Ratio (Days to Cover)	--
Short % of Float	--

Profit Margin	--
Return on Assets (ttm)	--
Return on Equity (ttm)	--

Revenue (ttm)	--
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm)	--
Diluted EPS (ttm)	--
Total Cash (mrq)	--
Total Debt/Equity (mrq)	--
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm)	--

TILLY'S CL A ORD (TLYS)

Smart Money Signals — TLYS

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

Below peak — only 69% of 3.0Y high

Outflows — 12% fewer funds vs a year ago

Heavy selling pressure — only 37% buying

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-6 vs last Q)

75% of holders stayed for 2+ years

Saturation — most institutions already know this story

Deep conviction — 82% of holders stayed 2+ years

Smaller funds dominant — 11% AUM from top-100

Hedge Fund Ownership: TLYS

Market Analysis: TLYS

Analyst Price Targets

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Company Profile: TLYS

Hedge Fund Positioning: TLYS

Statistics: TLYS

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Financial Highlights

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

Frequently Asked Questions — TILLY'S CL A ORD (TLYS)

Welcome to 13Foresight!