Based on 123 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their TITN positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 76% of 3.0Y peak
76% of all-time peak
123 funds currently hold this stock — 76% of the 3.0-year high of 162 funds (reached 2023 Q3). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding TITN is almost the same as a year ago (-2 funds, -2% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 45% buying
57 buying70 selling
Last quarter: 70 funds reduced or exited vs 57 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-7 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 25 → 22 → 19 → 12. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒
67% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 67% conviction (2yr+)
■ 20% medium
■ 13% new
82 out of 123 hedge funds have held TITN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
📊
Peak discovery — momentum slowing
25 → 25 → 22 → 19 → 12 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 25 → 22 → 19 → 12. TITN is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 68% veterans vs 19% newcomers
■ 68% veterans
■ 13% 1-2yr
■ 19% new
Entry-cohort mix of 124 holders: 84 (68%) are 2+ year veterans, 16 entered 1–2 years ago, and 24 (19%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 34% AUM from major funds
34% from top-100 AUM funds
35 of 122 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 34% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 2.4/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.