Based on 679 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their THC positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (97% of max)
97% of all-time peak
679 hedge funds hold THC right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶
Steady growth — +9% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+56 new funds entered over the past year (+9% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 47% buying
339 buying388 selling
Last quarter: 388 funds reduced or exited vs 339 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-10 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 127 → 112 → 108 → 98. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒
55% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 55% conviction (2yr+)
■ 26% medium
■ 19% new
375 out of 679 hedge funds have held THC for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +21%, value +0%
Last quarter: funds added +21% more shares while total portfolio value only changed +0%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~98 new funds/quarter
132 → 127 → 112 → 108 → 98 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 127 → 112 → 108 → 98. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 59% veterans vs 25% newcomers
■ 59% veterans
■ 16% 1-2yr
■ 25% new
Entry-cohort mix of 710 holders: 421 (59%) are 2+ year veterans, 112 entered 1–2 years ago, and 177 (25%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds
55% from top-100 AUM funds
61 of 674 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 55% of total institutional value in THC. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.