Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Teradyne Inc (TER)

1K + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in TER. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +202
Streak
4Q ▲
Buyers last Q
58%

Smart Money Signals — TER

Based on 1429 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added TER than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
1,429 hedge funds hold TER right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +99% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+711 new funds entered over the past year (+99% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 58% buying

854 buying611 selling
Last quarter: 854 funds bought or added vs 611 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+42 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new TER position: 199 → 292 → 303 → 345. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

45% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 45% conviction (2yr+) ■ 19% medium ■ 37% new
637 out of 1,429 hedge funds have held TER for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +98%, value +80%

Value
+80%
Shares
+98%
Last quarter: funds added +98% more shares while total portfolio value only changed +80%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

108 → 199 → 292 → 303 → 345 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 199 → 292 → 303 → 345. A growing number of institutions are discovering TER each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 53% veterans vs 38% newcomers

■ 53% veterans ■ 9% 1-2yr ■ 38% new
Entry-cohort mix of 1,486 holders: 792 (53%) are 2+ year veterans, 130 entered 1–2 years ago, and 564 (38%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 60% AUM from top-100 funds

60% from top-100 AUM funds
69 of 1417 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 60% of total institutional value in TER. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
5.0
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 5.0/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — TER

In 2026 Q2, 854 hedge funds were net buyers of TER (345 opened a new position, 509 added to an existing one), while 611 reduced or exited (468 trimmed, 143 sold completely) — a 58% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 4 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 60% of total institutional value in TER is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +202 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 1429.

Hedge Fund Ownership: TER

How many hedge funds hold TER — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of TER vs. share price

Market Analysis: TER

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: TER

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Strong Institutional Conviction

Multiple high-quality funds hold meaningful positions with strong conviction.

48 top-rated funds 27 high-conviction
Consensus
7.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
6.8
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: TER
1K + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in TER. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 1404 1227 14.43%
13F Shares 179M 149M 20.6%
Total Value $73.39B $40.81B 79.86%
New Positions 341 303 +38
Increased Positions 489 411 +78
Closed Positions 152 110 +42
Reduced Positions 453 395 +58
Total Calls 35 34 2.94%
Total Puts 33 28 17.86%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.94 0.82 Neutral

Statistics: TER

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

1K + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in TER. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 TER holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Fourier Capital Management Ltd 9.02% 11,924 $5.8M
2 Robocap Asset Management Ltd 8.36% 21,429 $10.4M
3 Anther Capital Ltd 8.26% 667,086 $322.8M
4 Totem Point Management, LLC 6.52% 22,032 $10.7M
5 WT Asset Management Ltd 6.32% 660,196 $319.4M
6 Tensor Edge Capital, LLC 5.72% 178,178 $86.2M
7 Alta Park Capital, LP 5.35% 120,779 $58.4M
8 Carmel Capital Management L.L.C. 4.45% 41,957 $20.3M
9 Lone Pine Capital LLC 4.42% 1,493,080 $722.4M
10 Grand Alliance Asset Management Ltd 4.36% 15,000 $7.3M
11 Klein Pavlis & Peasley Financial, INC. 4.34% 17,233 $8.3M
12 GFG Capital, LLC 4.22% 31,692 $15.3M
13 Seldon Capital LP 4.13% 27,300 $13.2M
14 Geneva Partners, LLC 3.68% 28,502 $13.8M
15 ClearAlpha Technologies LP 3.62% 4,363 $2.1M
16 Sachetta, LLC 3.60% 15,304 $7.4M
17 Windward Capital Management Co /Ca 3.59% 97,979 $47.4M
18 Gouws Capital LLC 3.58% 15,883 $7.7M
19 Talos Eurisko Asset Management LP 3.56% 51,720 $25.0M
20 Virtus Wealth Solutions LLC 3.41% 51,803 $25.1M
21 OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING Corp Ltd 3.36% 323,849 $156.7M
22 Amanah Holdings Trust 3.13% 110,000 $53.2M
23 Buttonwood Financial Advisors Inc. 3.11% 21,130 $10.2M
24 Berkshire Capital Holdings Inc 3.01% 28,750 $13.9M
25 Affinity Wealth Management LLC 2.77% 44,497 $21.5M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Teradyne Inc (TER)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for TER?

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row: For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added TER than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for TER?

Slight buying edge — 58% buying: Last quarter: 854 funds bought or added vs 611 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for TER holders?

Elite ownership — 60% AUM from top-100 funds: 69 of 1417 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 60% of total institutional value in TER. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held TER?

45% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 637 out of 1,429 hedge funds have held TER for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →