Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Atlassian Corporation (TEAM)

652 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in TEAM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -140
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
42%

Smart Money Signals — TEAM

Based on 655 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their TEAM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 79% of 3.0Y peak

79% of all-time peak
655 funds currently hold this stock — 79% of the 3.0-year high of 833 funds (reached 2025 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉

Outflows — 21% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
178 fewer hedge funds hold TEAM compared to a year ago (-21% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 42% buying

356 buying492 selling
Last quarter: 492 funds reduced or exited vs 356 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-64 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 102 → 116 → 175 → 111. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

62% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 62% conviction (2yr+) ■ 18% medium ■ 21% new
404 out of 655 hedge funds have held TEAM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +6%, value -57%

Value
-56%
Shares
+5%
Last quarter: funds added +6% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -57%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

160 → 102 → 116 → 175 → 111 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 102 → 116 → 175 → 111. A growing number of institutions are discovering TEAM each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 67% veterans vs 23% newcomers

■ 67% veterans ■ 9% 1-2yr ■ 23% new
Entry-cohort mix of 695 holders: 467 (67%) are 2+ year veterans, 65 entered 1–2 years ago, and 163 (23%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 40% AUM from top-100 funds

40% from top-100 AUM funds
61 of 647 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 40% of total institutional value in TEAM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
2.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — TEAM

In 2026 Q1, 356 hedge funds were net buyers of TEAM (111 opened a new position, 245 added to an existing one), while 492 reduced or exited (241 trimmed, 251 sold completely) — a 42% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. 40% of total institutional value in TEAM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -140 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 655.

Hedge Fund Ownership: TEAM

How many hedge funds hold TEAM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of TEAM vs. share price

Market Analysis: TEAM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: TEAM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Is It Too Late to Buy Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Signal Freshness measures how much TEAM has moved relative to its sector benchmark (XLK) since the 2026 Q1 13F filing. A stock that has barely outrun its sector is still a relatively fresh entry point — the fund's thesis has not yet been priced in by the broader market.

Since Quarter End March 31, 2026 · 84d ago
TEAM
+20.4%
XLK
+44.8%

TEAM outperformed XLK by -24.4% since March 31, 2026.

Since 13F Filing Date May 15, 2026 · 39d ago
TEAM
-6.0%
XLK
+9.1%

Since the filing became public, TEAM outperformed XLK by -15.1% .

Interpretation: The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference. Learn more →

Smart Money Signal ?
Broad Consensus, Selective Conviction

Many quality funds hold this stock, but top-tier positions remain relatively small.

53 top-rated funds 5 high-conviction
Consensus
7.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
4.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: TEAM
652 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in TEAM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 652 795 -17.99%
13F Shares 160M 153M 4.15%
Total Value $10.53B $24.71B -57.36%
New Positions 110 175 -65
Increased Positions 234 306 -72
Closed Positions 253 127 +126
Reduced Positions 231 249 -18
Total Calls 27 23 17.39%
Total Puts 20 23 -13.04%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.74 1.0 Neutral

Statistics: TEAM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

652 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in TEAM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 TEAM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Oberndorf William E 9.04% 70,645 $4.8M
2 Voyager Global Management LP 8.94% 3,850,000 $262.8M
3 Grafton Street Partners Management Company, LLC 7.12% 174,483 $11.9M
4 Harber Asset Management LLC 4.28% 98,029 $6.7M
5 Catalyst Private Wealth, LLC 3.93% 106,180 $7.2M
6 Capco Asset Management, LLC 3.24% 173,871 $11.9M
7 Carmignac Gestion 2.73% 2,603,770 $177.7M
8 Deepwater Asset Management, LLC 2.67% 61,676 $4.2M
9 Optimus Prime Fund Management Co., Ltd. 2.48% 377,500 $25.8M
10 Saber Capital Managment, LLC 2.32% 45,825 $3.1M
11 DnB Asset Management AS 1.97% 8,077,726 $551.3M
12 Monimus Capital Management, LP 1.79% 94,831 $6.5M
13 Tejara Capital Ltd 1.50% 66,500 $4.5M
14 Lane Generational LLC 1.46% 26,907 $1.8M
15 Ontario Teachers Pension Plan Board 1.27% 643,100 $43.9M
16 Brown Capital Management LLC 1.27% 130,838 $8.9M
17 Rubicon Global Capital Ltd 1.16% 40,000 $2.7M
18 GC Wealth Management RIA, LLC 0.94% 333,712 $22.8M
19 NZS Capital, LLC 0.83% 366,298 $25.0M
20 Ardmore Road Asset Management LP 0.83% 183,900 $12.6M
21 Oddo Bhf Asset Management Sas 0.78% 289,808 $19.8M
22 Chiron Capital Management, LLC 0.78% 11,101 $758K
23 Generali Investments Towarzystwo Funduszy Inwestycyjnych 0.70% 20,000 $1.4M
24 ClearAlpha Technologies LP 0.70% 4,996 $341K
25 Baillie Gifford & Co 0.69% 9,963,439 $680.0M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Atlassian Corporation (TEAM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for TEAM?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their TEAM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for TEAM?

More sellers than buyers — 42% buying: Last quarter: 492 funds reduced or exited vs 356 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for TEAM holders?

Elite ownership — 40% AUM from top-100 funds: 61 of 647 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 40% of total institutional value in TEAM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held TEAM?

62% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 404 out of 655 hedge funds have held TEAM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Is it too late to buy Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) following the 2026 Q1 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, TEAM has moved -6.0% since the 2026 Q1 13F filing date (May 15, 2026), compared to +9.1% for the XLK sector ETF — an outperformance of -15.1%. Since the quarter end (March 31, 2026), TEAM has gained +20.4% vs +44.8% for XLK. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →