Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

INVESCO EXCH TRADED FD TR II (TAN)

239 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in TAN. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +42
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
61%

Smart Money Signals — TAN

Based on 220 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added TAN than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊

High ownership — 82% of 3.0Y peak

82% of all-time peak
220 funds currently hold this stock — 82% of the 3.0-year high of 269 funds (reached 2023 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶

Steady growth — +18% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+33 new funds entered over the past year (+18% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying

114 buying72 selling
Last quarter: 114 funds were net buyers (58 opened a brand new position + 56 added to an existing one). Only 72 were sellers (56 trimmed + 16 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+24 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new TAN position: 29 → 27 → 34 → 58. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

63% of holders stayed for 2+ years

63% conviction (2yr+) 16% medium 21% new
138 out of 220 hedge funds have held TAN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +165% but shares only +78% — price-driven

Value
+164%
Shares
+78%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +165%, but actual share count only changed +78%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

39 → 29 → 27 → 34 → 58 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 29 → 27 → 34 → 58. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Deep conviction — 70% of holders stayed 2+ years

70% veterans 8% 1-2yr 23% new
Of 239 current holders: 167 (70%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
🏆

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds

61% from top-100 AUM funds
18 of 220 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 61% of total institutional value in TAN. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
2.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Hedge Fund Ownership: TAN

How many hedge funds hold TAN — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of TAN vs. share price

Market Analysis: TAN

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: TAN

-- --
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

22 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
5.9
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.2
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: TAN
2026 Q1 Stats Unlock in 20 days 239 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in TAN. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2025 Q4) Prior (2025 Q3) Change
Funds Holding 239 199 20.1%
13F Shares 14M 8M 78.38%
Total Value $907M $343M 164.63%
New Positions 60 34 +26
Increased Positions 78 65 +13
Closed Positions 16 29 -13
Reduced Positions 70 77 -7
Total Calls 13 12 8.33%
Total Puts 13 15 -13.33%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 1.25 Neutral

Statistics: TAN

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

239 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in TAN. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

Top 25 institutional holders of TAN — 2025 Q4 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Decker Retirement Planning Inc. 4.42% 174,929 $9.7M
2 Lake Hills Wealth Management, LLC 4.10% 131,468 $7.3M
3 October Effect Ltd 1.87% 29,207 $1.6M
4 NTV ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 0.49% 79,204 $4.4M
5 EHRLICH FINANCIAL GROUP 0.42% 12,968 $722K
6 ALTFEST L J & CO INC 0.39% 65,557 $3.7M
7 Q3 Asset Management 0.39% 28,748 $2K
8 Verity Asset Management, Inc. 0.38% 16,367 $912K
9 PATRIOT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. 0.13% 36,654 $2.0M
10 BW Gestao de Investimentos Ltda. 0.13% 70,165 $3.9M
11 Golden State Wealth Management, LLC 0.09% 14,505 $808K
12 Gemmer Asset Management LLC 0.09% 19,363 $1.1M
13 Friedenthal Financial 0.08% 3,029 $169K
14 PFG Investments, LLC 0.05% 20,625 $1.1M
15 MEITAV INVESTMENT HOUSE LTD 0.04% 69,810 $3.9M
16 CoreCap Advisors, LLC 0.04% 19,612 $1.1M
17 Private Advisor Group, LLC 0.03% 99,984 $5.6M
18 Essex Financial Services, Inc. 0.02% 7,704 $429K
19 Ledyard National Bank 0.02% 4,491 $250K
20 DAVENPORT & Co LLC 0.02% 66,995 $3.7M
21 Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc. 0.01% 101,473 $6K
22 Capital Investment Advisors, LLC 0.01% 15,376 $857K
23 Integrated Advisors Network LLC 0.01% 3,766 $210K
24 Banque Cantonale Vaudoise 0.01% 4,000 $223K
25 Vermillion Wealth Management, Inc. 0.01% 354 $20K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — INVESCO EXCH TRADED FD TR II (TAN)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for TAN?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added TAN than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for TAN?

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying: Last quarter: 114 funds were net buyers (58 opened a brand new position + 56 added to an existing one). Only 72 were sellers (56 trimmed + 16 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for TAN holders?

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds: 18 of 220 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 61% of total institutional value in TAN. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held TAN?

63% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 138 out of 220 hedge funds have held TAN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.