Based on 247 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added TAN than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊
High ownership — 91% of 3.0Y peak
91% of all-time peak
247 funds currently hold this stock — 91% of the 3.0-year high of 270 funds (reached 2023 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +34% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+62 new funds entered over the past year (+34% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 57% buying
125 buying96 selling
Last quarter: 125 funds bought or added vs 96 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-7 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 36 → 62 → 53 → 46. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒
61% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 61% conviction (2yr+)
■ 15% medium
■ 24% new
150 out of 247 hedge funds have held TAN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~46 new funds/quarter
30 → 36 → 62 → 53 → 46 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 36 → 62 → 53 → 46. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 68% veterans vs 22% newcomers
■ 68% veterans
■ 9% 1-2yr
■ 22% new
Entry-cohort mix of 269 holders: 184 (68%) are 2+ year veterans, 25 entered 1–2 years ago, and 60 (22%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 65% AUM from top-100 funds
65% from top-100 AUM funds
27 of 243 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 65% of total institutional value in TAN. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.