Based on 17 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SWVXX positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 81% of 3.0Y peak
81% of all-time peak
17 funds currently hold this stock — 81% of the 3.0-year high of 21 funds (reached 2025 Q3). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 6% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
1 fewer hedge funds hold SWVXX compared to a year ago (-6% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 50% buying
14 buying14 selling
Last quarter: 14 funds bought or added vs 14 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~7 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 6 → 4 → 6 → 7. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 35% long-term, 47% new
■ 35% conviction (2yr+)
■ 18% medium
■ 47% new
Of the 17 current holders: 6 (35%) held >2 years, 3 held 1–2 years, and 8 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~7 new funds/quarter
7 → 6 → 4 → 6 → 7 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 6 → 4 → 6 → 7. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 41% veterans vs 41% newcomers
■ 41% veterans
■ 18% 1-2yr
■ 41% new
Entry-cohort mix of 17 holders: 7 (41%) are 2+ year veterans, 3 entered 1–2 years ago, and 7 (41%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100
0% from top-100 AUM funds
0 of 17 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.3/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.