Based on 17 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SWVXX positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 81% of 3.0Y peak
81% of all-time peak
17 funds currently hold this stock — 81% of the 3.0-year high of 21 funds (reached 2025 Q3). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶
Steady growth — +6% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+1 new funds entered over the past year (+6% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 44% buying
11 buying14 selling
Last quarter: 14 funds reduced or exited vs 11 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~4 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 3 → 7 → 6 → 4. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔄
Mostly new holders — 29% entered in last year
■ 24% conviction (2yr+)
■ 47% medium
■ 29% new
Only 4 funds (24%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~4 new funds/quarter
5 → 3 → 7 → 6 → 4 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 3 → 7 → 6 → 4. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 18% veterans, 47% new entrants
■ 18% veterans
■ 35% 1-2yr
■ 47% new
Of 17 current holders: 3 (18%) held 2+ years, 6 held 1–2 years, 8 (47%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100
0% from top-100 AUM funds
0 of 17 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.4/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.