Based on 33 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
📊
High ownership — 85% of 3.0Y peak
85% of all-time peak
33 funds currently hold this stock — 85% of the 3.0-year high of 39 funds (reached 2023 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding SWAN is almost the same as a year ago (-1 funds, -3% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 59% buying
16 buying11 selling
Last quarter: 16 funds bought or added vs 11 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~4 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 5 → 2 → 7 → 4. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
70% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 70% conviction (2yr+)
■ 15% medium
■ 15% new
23 out of 33 hedge funds have held SWAN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~4 new funds/quarter
6 → 5 → 2 → 7 → 4 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 5 → 2 → 7 → 4. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Deep conviction — 76% of holders stayed 2+ years
■ 76% veterans
■ 9% 1-2yr
■ 15% new
Of 33 current holders: 25 (76%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 1% AUM from top-100
1% from top-100 AUM funds
5 of 33 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 1% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.