Based on 3 hedge funds · latest filing: 2023 Q4 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SSUNF positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 18% of 2.2Y high
18% of all-time peak
Only 3 funds hold SSUNF today versus a peak of 17 funds at 2022 Q1 — just 18% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 70% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
7 fewer hedge funds hold SSUNF compared to a year ago (-70% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 0% buying
0 buying10 selling
Last quarter: 10 funds sold vs only 0 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~0 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 1 → 1 → 4 → 0. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -26%, value -100%
Last quarter: funds added -26% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -100%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~0 new funds/quarter
1 → 1 → 1 → 4 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 1 → 1 → 4 → 0. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
Exit risk score 2.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.