Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Simpson Mfg Inc (SSD)

475 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in SSD. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +32
Streak
11Q ▲
Buyers last Q
51%

Smart Money Signals — SSD

Based on 487 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 11 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 11 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added SSD than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
487 hedge funds hold SSD right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +14% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+61 new funds entered over the past year (+14% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 51% buying

234 buying229 selling
Last quarter: 234 funds bought or added vs 229 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+13 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new SSD position: 58 → 69 → 69 → 82. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

61% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 61% conviction (2yr+) ■ 19% medium ■ 20% new
298 out of 487 hedge funds have held SSD for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

59 → 58 → 69 → 69 → 82 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 58 → 69 → 69 → 82. A growing number of institutions are discovering SSD each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 65% veterans vs 21% newcomers

■ 65% veterans ■ 13% 1-2yr ■ 21% new
Entry-cohort mix of 495 holders: 324 (65%) are 2+ year veterans, 65 entered 1–2 years ago, and 106 (21%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 53% AUM from top-100 funds

53% from top-100 AUM funds
59 of 485 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 53% of total institutional value in SSD. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.7
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — SSD

In 2026 Q2, 234 hedge funds were net buyers of SSD (82 opened a new position, 152 added to an existing one), while 229 reduced or exited (179 trimmed, 50 sold completely) — a 51% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 11 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 53% of total institutional value in SSD is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +32 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 487.

Hedge Fund Ownership: SSD

How many hedge funds hold SSD — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of SSD vs. share price

Market Analysis: SSD

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: SSD

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

20 top-rated funds 5 high-conviction
Consensus
5.7
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
3.3
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: SSD
2026 Q3 Stats Unlock in 19 days 475 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in SSD. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 475 455 4.4%
13F Shares 41M 41M 0.93%
Total Value $8.38B $6.77B 23.7%
New Positions 78 69 +9
Increased Positions 148 150 -2
Closed Positions 56 49 +7
Reduced Positions 175 157 +18
Total Calls 5 2 150.0%
Total Puts 4 1 300.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.8 0.5 Neutral

Statistics: SSD

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

475 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in SSD. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 SSD holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 North Berkeley Wealth Management, LLC 6.13% 72,440 $15.2M
2 Maren Capital LLC 4.98% 513,029 $107.4M
3 Fivespan Partners, LP 4.44% 90,000 $18.8M
4 Baker Avenue Asset Management, LP 3.62% 914,514 $191.5M
5 Port Capital LLC 3.37% 394,379 $82.6M
6 ValueAct Holdings, L.P. 3.09% 830,642 $173.9M
7 Cornerstone Capital, Inc. 2.68% 143,047 $29.9M
8 Berkeley, Inc 2.48% 37,728 $7.9M
9 Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management LLC 2.32% 3,568,049 $747.0M
10 Ranger Investment Management, L.P. 2.01% 151,834 $31.8M
11 Conestoga Capital Advisors, LLC 1.72% 377,341 $79.0M
12 Fiduciary Management Inc /Wi/ 1.21% 404,809 $84.7M
13 Westview Management dba Westview Investment Advisors 1.16% 11,286 $2.4M
14 Champlain Investment Partners, LLC 1.16% 214,765 $45.0M
15 Snyder Capital Management L P 1.09% 301,491 $63.1M
16 Aristides Capital LLC 0.89% 21,945 $4.6M
17 VELA Investment Management, LLC 0.88% 19,664 $4.1M
18 Disciplined Growth Investors Inc /Mn 0.85% 240,664 $50.4M
19 Riverbridge Partners LLC 0.73% 124,379 $26.0M
20 Illumine Investment Management, LLC 0.67% — $1.0M
21 Sierra Legacy Group 0.49% 3,010 $630K
22 Royce & Associates LP 0.47% 277,357 $58.1M
23 Schwerin Boyle Capital Management Inc 0.42% 16,400 $3.4M
24 Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLC 0.40% 160,912 $33.7M
25 Impact Capital Partners LLC 0.37% 6,422 $1.3M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Stocks with similar institutional ownership

HYD 127 holdersFLO 127 holdersBC 126 holdersREZI 126 holdersENPH 126 holdersTNL 126 holdersONDS 126 holdersHTGC 126 holdersNJR 126 holdersIYE 125 holdersALK 125 holdersQS 125 holders All stocks →

Frequently Asked Questions — Simpson Mfg Inc (SSD)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for SSD?

Buying streak — 11 quarters in a row: For 11 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added SSD than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for SSD?

Slight buying edge — 51% buying: Last quarter: 234 funds bought or added vs 229 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for SSD holders?

Elite ownership — 53% AUM from top-100 funds: 59 of 485 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 53% of total institutional value in SSD. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held SSD?

61% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 298 out of 487 hedge funds have held SSD for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →