Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Tron Inc (SRM)

55 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in SRM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +19
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
63%

Smart Money Signals — SRM

Based on 57 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added SRM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
57 hedge funds hold SRM right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +104% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+29 new funds entered over the past year (+104% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 63% buying

46 buying27 selling
Last quarter: 46 funds were net buyers (33 opened a brand new position + 13 added to an existing one). Only 27 were sellers (13 trimmed + 14 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+19 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new SRM position: 19 → 7 → 14 → 33. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
📌

Mixed — 32% long-term, 51% new

■ 32% conviction (2yr+) ■ 18% medium ■ 51% new
Of the 57 current holders: 18 (32%) held >2 years, 10 held 1–2 years, and 29 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +46%, value +1%

Value
+0%
Shares
+46%
Last quarter: funds added +46% more shares while total portfolio value only changed +1%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

20 → 19 → 7 → 14 → 33 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 19 → 7 → 14 → 33. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🌱

Early stage — 60% of holders entered in last year

■ 32% veterans ■ 8% 1-2yr ■ 60% new
Of 60 current holders: 36 (60%) entered in the past year, only 19 (32%) are 2+ year veterans. This is an early-phase institutional idea — still being discovered. High upside potential if the thesis plays out, but thin conviction base.
🏆

Elite ownership — 71% AUM from top-100 funds

71% from top-100 AUM funds
27 of 55 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 71% of total institutional value in SRM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
5.2
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 5.2/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — SRM

In 2026 Q2, 46 hedge funds were net buyers of SRM (33 opened a new position, 13 added to an existing one), while 27 reduced or exited (13 trimmed, 14 sold completely) — a 63% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 71% of total institutional value in SRM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +19 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 57.

Hedge Fund Ownership: SRM

How many hedge funds hold SRM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of SRM vs. share price

Market Analysis: SRM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: SRM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

5 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
3.4
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: SRM
2026 Q3 Stats Unlock in 30 days 55 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in SRM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 55 38 44.74%
13F Shares 12M 8M 46.46%
Total Value $19M $19M 0.6%
New Positions 33 14 +19
Increased Positions 10 7 +3
Closed Positions 14 11 +3
Reduced Positions 13 10 +3
Total Calls 3 3 -
Total Puts 2 3 -33.33%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.67 1.0 Bullish

Statistics: SRM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

55 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in SRM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 SRM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Abel Hall, LLC 0.02% 54,473 $88K
2 Two Sigma Securities, LLC 0.00% 14,398 $23K
3 XTX Topco Ltd 0.00% 40,566 $65K
4 Traynor Capital Management, Inc. 0.00% 11,000 $18K
5 Tower Research Capital LLC (TRC) 0.00% 14,030 $23K
6 Police & Firemen's Retirement System of New Jersey 0.00% 31,328 $50K
7 LPL Financial LLC 0.00% 725,079 $1.2M
8 IFP Advisors, Inc 0.00% 7,036 $11K
9 Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. 0.00% 4,689 $8K
10 Two Sigma Investments, LP 0.00% 168,713 $272K
11 Intech Investment Management LLC 0.00% 12,552 $20K
12 Nomura Holdings Inc 0.00% 71,418 $115K
13 New York State Common Retirement Fund 0.00% 56,600 $91K
14 Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co 0.00% 292,858 $472K
15 AdvisorNet Financial, Inc 0.00% 1,225 $2K
16 BlackRock, Inc. 0.00% 3,303,714 $5.3M
17 Vanguard Capital Management LLC 0.00% 2,064,362 $3.3M
18 Group One Trading LLC 0.00% 29,672 $48K
19 Susquehanna International Group, LLP 0.00% 533,900 $860K
20 Goldman Sachs Group Inc 0.00% 449,265 $723K
21 Strs Ohio 0.00% 10,100 $16K
22 Rhumbline Advisers 0.00% 42,939 $69K
23 MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd. 0.00% 23,791 $38K
24 Susquehanna International Group, LLP 0.00% 321,000 $517K
25 UBS Group AG 0.00% 171,354 $276K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Tron Inc (SRM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for SRM?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added SRM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for SRM?

More buyers than sellers — 63% buying: Last quarter: 46 funds were net buyers (33 opened a brand new position + 13 added to an existing one). Only 27 were sellers (13 trimmed + 14 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for SRM holders?

Elite ownership — 71% AUM from top-100 funds: 27 of 55 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 71% of total institutional value in SRM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held SRM?

Mixed — 32% long-term, 51% new: Of the 57 current holders: 18 (32%) held >2 years, 10 held 1–2 years, and 29 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →