Based on 20 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row
For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added SKYH/WS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
20 hedge funds hold SKYH/WS right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +33% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+5 new funds entered over the past year (+33% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 50% buying
6 buying6 selling
Last quarter: 6 funds bought or added vs 6 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 4 → 2 → 3 → 3. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
55% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 55% conviction (2yr+)
■ 25% medium
■ 20% new
11 out of 20 hedge funds have held SKYH/WS for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +18%, value -19%
Last quarter: funds added +18% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -19%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~3 new funds/quarter
3 → 4 → 2 → 3 → 3 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 4 → 2 → 3 → 3. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 50% veterans vs 35% newcomers
■ 50% veterans
■ 15% 1-2yr
■ 35% new
Entry-cohort mix of 20 holders: 10 (50%) are 2+ year veterans, 3 entered 1–2 years ago, and 7 (35%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100
0% from top-100 AUM funds
1 of 18 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.