Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Skyward Specialty Ins Group (SKWD)

240 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in SKWD. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +4
Streak
3Q ▲
Buyers last Q
52%

Smart Money Signals — SKWD

Based on 243 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added SKWD than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (98% of max)

98% of all-time peak
243 hedge funds hold SKWD right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
〰️

Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year

fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding SKWD is almost the same as a year ago (-4 funds, -2% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 52% buying

139 buying126 selling
Last quarter: 139 funds bought or added vs 126 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~44 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 33 → 46 → 47 → 44. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

40% of holders stayed for 2+ years

40% conviction (2yr+) 31% medium 28% new
98 out of 243 hedge funds have held SKWD for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +39% but shares only +11% — price-driven

Value
+38%
Shares
+10%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +39%, but actual share count only changed +11%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

45 → 33 → 46 → 47 → 44 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 33 → 46 → 47 → 44. A growing number of institutions are discovering SKWD each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 40% veterans vs 34% newcomers

40% veterans 26% 1-2yr 34% new
Entry-cohort mix of 245 holders: 98 (40%) are 2+ year veterans, 63 entered 1–2 years ago, and 84 (34%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 51% AUM from top-100 funds

51% from top-100 AUM funds
51 of 243 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 51% of total institutional value in SKWD. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.7
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — SKWD

In 2026 Q2, 139 hedge funds were net buyers of SKWD (44 opened a new position, 95 added to an existing one), while 126 reduced or exited (86 trimmed, 40 sold completely) — a 52% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 3 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 51% of total institutional value in SKWD is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +4 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 243.

Hedge Fund Ownership: SKWD

How many hedge funds hold SKWD — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of SKWD vs. share price

Market Analysis: SKWD

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: SKWD

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

18 top-rated funds 4 high-conviction
Consensus
5.6
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
4.6
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: SKWD
240 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in SKWD. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 240 239 0.42%
13F Shares 39M 38M 3.95%
Total Value $2.08B $1.53B 35.78%
New Positions 43 47 -4
Increased Positions 92 81 +11
Closed Positions 42 42 -
Reduced Positions 85 83 +2
Total Calls 1 1 -
Total Puts 1 3 -66.67%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 3.0 Neutral

Statistics: SKWD

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

240 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in SKWD. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 SKWD holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Reinhart Partners, LLC. 3.86% 2,894,407 $168.9M
2 Karl Kapital LLC 3.26% 93,911 $5.5M
3 Sparta 24 Ltd. 2.68% 50,000 $2.9M
4 Ashford Capital Management Inc 2.30% 368,052 $21.5M
5 Alamar Capital Management, LLC 1.10% 37,120 $2.2M
6 Riverwater Partners LLC 1.04% 59,829 $3.5M
7 Champlain Investment Partners, LLC 0.97% 645,526 $37.7M
8 VARCOV Co. 0.64% 28,783 $1.7M
9 DC Investments Management, LLC 0.60% 29,987 $1.7M
10 Westwood Holdings Group Inc 0.56% 1,274,445 $74.4M
11 Emerald Mutual Fund Advisers Trust 0.55% 266,150 $15.5M
12 Emerald Advisers, LLC 0.51% 373,762 $21.8M
13 Dockside LLC 0.50% 36,678 $2.1M
14 Tuttle Capital Management, LLC 0.44% 11,316 $660K
15 Peregrine Capital Management LLC 0.44% 232,419 $13.6M
16 Oberweis Asset Management Inc/ 0.43% 359,100 $21.0M
17 Wasatch Advisors LP 0.36% 954,489 $55.7M
18 FJ Capital Management LLC 0.28% 36,966 $2.2M
19 Wakefield Asset Management LLLP 0.28% 21,247 $1.2M
20 Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLC 0.26% 372,336 $21.7M
21 Callahan Advisors, LLC 0.24% 54,830 $3.2M
22 PhiloSmith Capital Corp 0.24% 15,000 $875K
23 HMS Capital Management, LLC 0.23% 10,555 $616K
24 Campbell Newman Asset Management Inc 0.20% 45,771 $2.7M
25 Globeflex Capital L P 0.18% 23,925 $1.4M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Skyward Specialty Ins Group (SKWD)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for SKWD?

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row: For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added SKWD than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for SKWD?

Slight buying edge — 52% buying: Last quarter: 139 funds bought or added vs 126 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for SKWD holders?

Elite ownership — 51% AUM from top-100 funds: 51 of 243 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 51% of total institutional value in SKWD. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held SKWD?

40% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 98 out of 243 hedge funds have held SKWD for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →