Based on 14 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SILO positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 93% of 3.0Y peak
93% of all-time peak
14 funds currently hold this stock — 93% of the 3.0-year high of 15 funds (reached 2025 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶
Steady growth — +17% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+2 new funds entered over the past year (+17% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 53% buying
10 buying9 selling
Last quarter: 10 funds bought or added vs 9 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~6 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 3 → 6 → 4 → 6. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 29% long-term, 43% new
■ 29% conviction (2yr+)
■ 29% medium
■ 43% new
Of the 14 current holders: 4 (29%) held >2 years, 4 held 1–2 years, and 6 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~6 new funds/quarter
4 → 3 → 6 → 4 → 6 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 3 → 6 → 4 → 6. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 36% veterans, 50% new entrants
■ 36% veterans
■ 14% 1-2yr
■ 50% new
Of 14 current holders: 5 (36%) held 2+ years, 2 held 1–2 years, 7 (50%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
✅
Strong quality — 32% AUM from major funds
32% from top-100 AUM funds
7 of 14 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 32% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
4.0
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.0/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.