Based on 50 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SIEGY positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 85% of 3.0Y peak
85% of all-time peak
50 funds currently hold this stock — 85% of the 3.0-year high of 59 funds (reached 2025 Q3). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 4% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
2 fewer hedge funds hold SIEGY compared to a year ago (-4% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 44% buying
24 buying30 selling
Last quarter: 30 funds reduced or exited vs 24 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~10 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 10 → 8 → 5 → 10. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
52% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 52% conviction (2yr+)
■ 32% medium
■ 16% new
26 out of 50 hedge funds have held SIEGY for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +7%, value -42%
Last quarter: funds added +7% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -42%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📊
Peak discovery — momentum slowing
12 → 10 → 8 → 5 → 10 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 10 → 8 → 5 → 10. SIEGY is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 60% veterans vs 24% newcomers
■ 60% veterans
■ 16% 1-2yr
■ 24% new
Entry-cohort mix of 50 holders: 30 (60%) are 2+ year veterans, 8 entered 1–2 years ago, and 12 (24%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 5% AUM from top-100
5% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 50 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 5% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.