Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Shoulder Innovations Inc (SI)

71 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in SI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +16
Streak
4Q ▲
Buyers last Q
74%

Smart Money Signals — SI

Based on 72 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added SI than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
72 hedge funds hold SI right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +7100% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+71 new funds entered over the past year (+7100% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 74% buying

56 buying20 selling
Last quarter: 56 funds were net buyers (26 opened a brand new position + 30 added to an existing one). Only 20 were sellers (10 trimmed + 10 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+10 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new SI position: 41 → 12 → 16 → 26. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔄

Mostly new holders — 61% entered in last year

1% conviction (2yr+) 38% medium 61% new
Only 1 funds (1%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💰

Value +56% but shares only +11% — price-driven

Value
+56%
Shares
+11%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +56%, but actual share count only changed +11%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📊

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

0 → 41 → 12 → 16 → 26 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 41 → 12 → 16 → 26. SI is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🌱

Early stage — 97% of holders entered in last year

3% veterans 0% 1-2yr 97% new
Of 72 current holders: 70 (97%) entered in the past year, only 2 (3%) are 2+ year veterans. This is an early-phase institutional idea — still being discovered. High upside potential if the thesis plays out, but thin conviction base.
🏆

Elite ownership — 64% AUM from top-100 funds

64% from top-100 AUM funds
25 of 72 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 64% of total institutional value in SI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
6.5
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 6.5/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — SI

In 2026 Q2, 56 hedge funds were net buyers of SI (26 opened a new position, 30 added to an existing one), while 20 reduced or exited (10 trimmed, 10 sold completely) — a 74% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. This marks 4 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 64% of total institutional value in SI is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +16 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 72.

Hedge Fund Ownership: SI

How many hedge funds hold SI — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of SI vs. share price

Market Analysis: SI

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: SI

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

7 top-rated funds 2 high-conviction
Consensus
3.9
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
2.1
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: SI
71 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in SI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 71 56 26.79%
13F Shares 8M 7M 10.97%
Total Value $163M $104M 55.83%
New Positions 26 16 +10
Increased Positions 29 23 +6
Closed Positions 11 9 +2
Reduced Positions 10 8 +2
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: SI

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

71 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in SI. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 SI holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Sectoral Asset Management Inc 6.09% 430,407 $8.7M
2 CM Management, LLC 1.87% 145,000 $2.9M
3 Roubaix Capital, LLC 1.86% 255,288 $5.2M
4 KCM Capital Inc 0.98% 300,000 $6.1M
5 Parkman Healthcare Partners LLC 0.47% 226,212 $4.6M
6 Informed Momentum Co LLC 0.10% 57,998 $1.2M
7 Driehaus Capital Management LLC 0.03% 253,760 $5.1M
8 Readystate Asset Management LP 0.03% 39,431 $800K
9 Armstrong Advisory Group, Inc 0.02% 17,290 $351K
10 Walleye Capital LLC 0.01% 86,155 $1.7M
11 China Universal Asset Management Co., Ltd. 0.01% 5,000 $101K
12 Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC 0.01% 77,737 $1.6M
13 King Luther Capital Management Corp 0.00% 52,350 $1.1M
14 Compass Financial Management LLC 0.00% 1,472 $30K
15 Blue Trust, Inc. 0.00% 15,719 $319K
16 Fmr LLC 0.00% 3,673,960 $74.5M
17 HighTower Advisors, LLC 0.00% 102,640 $2.1M
18 Squarepoint Ops LLC 0.00% 44,159 $896K
19 Marshall Wace, LLP 0.00% 38,667 $784K
20 Sei Investments Co 0.00% 34,350 $697K
21 MetLife Investment Management, LLC 0.00% 6,130 $124K
22 Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. 0.00% 954 $19K
23 Point72 Asset Management, L.P. 0.00% 22,920 $465K
24 Tower Research Capital LLC (TRC) 0.00% 892 $18K
25 Los Angeles Capital Management LLC 0.00% 5,847 $119K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Shoulder Innovations Inc (SI)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for SI?

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row: For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added SI than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for SI?

More buyers than sellers — 74% buying: Last quarter: 56 funds were net buyers (26 opened a brand new position + 30 added to an existing one). Only 20 were sellers (10 trimmed + 10 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for SI holders?

Elite ownership — 64% AUM from top-100 funds: 25 of 72 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 64% of total institutional value in SI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held SI?

Mostly new holders — 61% entered in last year: Only 1 funds (1%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →