Based on 14 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SHECY positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 74% of 3.0Y peak
74% of all-time peak
14 funds currently hold this stock — 74% of the 3.0-year high of 19 funds (reached 2024 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶
Steady growth — +17% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+2 new funds entered over the past year (+17% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 50% buying
8 buying8 selling
Last quarter: 8 funds bought or added vs 8 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-7 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 2 → 0 → 9 → 2. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒
50% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 50% conviction (2yr+)
■ 29% medium
■ 21% new
7 out of 14 hedge funds have held SHECY for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰
Value +79% but shares only +37% — price-driven
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +79%, but actual share count only changed +37%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~2 new funds/quarter
2 → 2 → 0 → 9 → 2 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 0 → 9 → 2. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 50% veterans vs 36% newcomers
■ 50% veterans
■ 14% 1-2yr
■ 36% new
Entry-cohort mix of 14 holders: 7 (50%) are 2+ year veterans, 2 entered 1–2 years ago, and 5 (36%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 28% AUM from major funds
28% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 14 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 28% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 3.1/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.