Service Corp Intl (SCI) Hedge Fund Ownership (Q2 2026)

Q: Is it too late to buy Service Corp Intl (SCI) following the 2026 Q2 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, SCI has moved -6.9% since the 2026 Q2 13F filing date (August 14, 2026), compared to -6.1% for the XLY sector ETF — an outperformance of -0.8%. Since the quarter end (June 30, 2026), SCI gained +2.8% vs -5.3% for XLY. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Service Corp Intl (SCI)

542 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in SCI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Smart Money Signals — SCI

Based on 550 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q

For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SCI positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

🏔️

At the ownership peak (97% of max)

97% of all-time peak

550 hedge funds hold SCI right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.

〰️

Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year

fund count last 6Q

The number of hedge funds holding SCI is almost the same as a year ago (-14 funds, -2% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.

🟠

More sellers than buyers — 44% buying

239 buying299 selling

Last quarter: 299 funds reduced or exited vs 239 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

➡️

Steady new buyers — ~79 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter

Funds opening this position for the first time: 69 → 68 → 77 → 79. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.

🔒

67% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 67% conviction (2yr+) ■ 16% medium ■ 17% new

367 out of 550 hedge funds have held SCI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

📈

Growing discovery — still being found

77 → 69 → 68 → 77 → 79 new funds/Q

New funds entering each quarter: 69 → 68 → 77 → 79. A growing number of institutions are discovering SCI each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.

🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 70% veterans vs 20% newcomers

■ 70% veterans ■ 10% 1-2yr ■ 20% new

Entry-cohort mix of 562 holders: 395 (70%) are 2+ year veterans, 57 entered 1–2 years ago, and 110 (20%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.

🏆

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds

61% from top-100 AUM funds

62 of 549 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 61% of total institutional value in SCI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

3.6

out of 10

Low Exit Risk

Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Metric	All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)	Prior (2026 Q1)	Change
Funds Holding	542	561	-3.39%
13F Shares	130M	129M	0.44%
Total Value	$9.07B	$9.69B	-6.42%
New Positions	75	77	-2
Increased Positions	154	183	-29
Closed Positions	93	65	+28
Reduced Positions	206	185	+21
Total Calls	6	6	-
Total Puts	6	5	20.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio	1.0	0.83	Neutral

Metric

All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)

Prior (2026 Q1)

Change

Funds Holding

542

561

-3.39%

13F Shares

130M

129M

0.44%

Total Value

$9.07B

$9.69B

-6.42%

New Positions

-2

Increased Positions

154

183

-29

Closed Positions

+28

Reduced Positions

206

185

+21

Total Calls

Total Puts

20.0%

PUT/CALL Ratio

1.0

0.83

Neutral

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

542 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in SCI. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:

FILTER:All New Added To Reduced No Change | Overweight >5%

Top 25 SCI holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
#	Investor	% of Portfolio	Shares	Mkt Value
1	Dudley & Shanley, INC.	4.22%	367,783	$27.9M
2	Catawba River Capital	3.84%	113,011	$8.6M
3	Turtle Creek Asset Management Inc.	3.35%	1,130,526	$85.9M
4	LRT Capital Management, LLC	3.01%	61,048	$4.6M
5	Castlefield Investment Partners LLP	2.59%	50,154	$3.8M
6	Global Alpha Capital Management Ltd.	1.98%	434,105	$33.0M
7	Select Equity Group, L.P.	1.25%	3,326,683	$252.7M
8	Comprehensive Financial Consultants Institutional, Inc.	1.09%	54,386	$4.1M
9	Bell Asset Management Ltd	0.98%	48,444	$3.7M
10	Adkins Seale Capital Management LLC	0.90%	11,617	$906K
11	Nordwand Advisors, LLC	0.88%	75,525	$5.7M
12	Blue Chip Partners, LLC	0.82%	171,536	$13.0M
13	Morton Community Bank	0.78%	50,285	$3.8M
14	LWM Advisory Services, LLC	0.72%	5,303	$403K
15	2Xideas AG	0.63%	19,237	$1.5M
16	JGP Wealth Management, LLC	0.60%	88,016	$6.7M
17	Security National Bank of Sioux City Iowa /Ia/	0.56%	17,835	$1.4M
18	Aureus Asset Management, LLC	0.54%	117,446	$8.9M
19	TMB Capital Partners, LLC	0.53%	22,521	$1.7M
20	Bdf-Gestion	0.53%	30,000	$4.0M
21	Security National Bank of So Dak	0.51%	14,665	$1.1M
22	Comgest Global Investors S.A.S.	0.50%	298,642	$22.7M
23	Winthrop Partners - WNY, LLC	0.50%	13,204	$1.0M
24	RFG Advisory, LLC	0.48%	406,514	$30.9M
25	Round Hill Asset Management	0.48%	10,105	$768K

Investor	Ownership History	% of Portfolio	Prev %	Rank	Conviction	Avg Buy Price	13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y	Sell Timing	Shares	Mkt Value	Change	Change %	Source	Quarter	Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Service Corp Intl (SCI)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for SCI?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SCI positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for SCI?

More sellers than buyers — 44% buying: Last quarter: 299 funds reduced or exited vs 239 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for SCI holders?

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds: 62 of 549 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 61% of total institutional value in SCI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held SCI?

67% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 367 out of 550 hedge funds have held SCI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Is it too late to buy Service Corp Intl (SCI) following the 2026 Q2 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, SCI has moved -6.9% since the 2026 Q2 13F filing date (August 14, 2026), compared to -6.1% for the XLY sector ETF — an outperformance of -0.8%. Since the quarter end (June 30, 2026), SCI has gained +2.8% vs -5.3% for XLY. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Market Cap	--
Enterprise Value	--
Trailing P/E	--
Forward P/E	--
PEG Ratio (5yr expected)	--
Price/Sales (ttm)	--
Price/Book (mrq)	--
Enterprise Value/Revenue	--
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	--
Beta (5Y Monthly)	--
Short Ratio (Days to Cover)	--
Short % of Float	--

Profit Margin	--
Return on Assets (ttm)	--
Return on Equity (ttm)	--

Revenue (ttm)	--
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm)	--
Diluted EPS (ttm)	--
Total Cash (mrq)	--
Total Debt/Equity (mrq)	--
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm)	--

Service Corp Intl (SCI)

Smart Money Signals — SCI

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

At the ownership peak (97% of max)

Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year

More sellers than buyers — 44% buying

Steady new buyers — ~79 new funds per quarter

67% of holders stayed for 2+ years

Growing discovery — still being found

Veteran-anchored — 70% veterans vs 20% newcomers

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds

Institutional Sentiment Summary — SCI

Hedge Fund Ownership: SCI

Market Analysis: SCI

Analyst Price Targets

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Company Profile: SCI

Is It Too Late to Buy Service Corp Intl (SCI) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Hedge Fund Positioning: SCI

Statistics: SCI

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Financial Highlights

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

Frequently Asked Questions — Service Corp Intl (SCI)

Welcome to 13Foresight!