Based on 20 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added SBCWW than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 61% of 3.0Y high
61% of all-time peak
Only 20 funds hold SBCWW today versus a peak of 33 funds at 2023 Q2 — just 61% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 13% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
3 fewer hedge funds hold SBCWW compared to a year ago (-13% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 36% buying
4 buying7 selling
Last quarter: 7 funds sold vs only 4 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~2 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 1 → 1 → 1 → 2. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
70% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 70% conviction (2yr+)
■ 15% medium
■ 15% new
14 out of 20 hedge funds have held SBCWW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰
Price up while funds trimmed (+11% value, -10% shares)
Last quarter: total value of institutional SBCWW holdings rose +11% even though funds reduced share count by 10%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~2 new funds/quarter
3 → 1 → 1 → 1 → 2 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 1 → 1 → 1 → 2. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Deep conviction — 75% of holders stayed 2+ years
■ 75% veterans
■ 0% 1-2yr
■ 25% new
Of 20 current holders: 15 (75%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 3% AUM from top-100
3% from top-100 AUM funds
3 of 20 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 3% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.1/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.