Based on 1 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 5 quarters in a row
For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SAVE positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 0% of 3.0Y high
0% of all-time peak
Only 1 funds hold SAVE today versus a peak of 239 funds at 2023 Q4 — just 0% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 100% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
214 fewer hedge funds hold SAVE compared to a year ago (-100% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 0% buying
0 buying29 selling
Last quarter: 29 funds sold vs only 0 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-9 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 38 → 35 → 9 → 0. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
⚠️
Saturation — most institutions already know this story
57 → 38 → 35 → 9 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 38 → 35 → 9 → 0. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
Exit risk score 2.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.