Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Filana Therapeutics Inc (SAVA)

98 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in SAVA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -10
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
35%

Smart Money Signals — SAVA

Based on 98 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SAVA positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻

Below peak — only 59% of 3.0Y high

59% of all-time peak
Only 98 funds hold SAVA today versus a peak of 166 funds at 2024 Q3 — just 59% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉

Outflows — 19% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
23 fewer hedge funds hold SAVA compared to a year ago (-19% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴

Heavy selling pressure — only 35% buying

33 buying61 selling
Last quarter: 61 funds sold vs only 33 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-9 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 19 → 20 → 22 → 13. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

59% of holders stayed for 2+ years

59% conviction (2yr+) 22% medium 18% new
58 out of 98 hedge funds have held SAVA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +1%, value -15%

Value
-15%
Shares
+1%
Last quarter: funds added +1% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -15%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~13 new funds/quarter

16 → 19 → 20 → 22 → 13 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 19 → 20 → 22 → 13. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 72% veterans vs 16% newcomers

72% veterans 12% 1-2yr 16% new
Entry-cohort mix of 106 holders: 76 (72%) are 2+ year veterans, 13 entered 1–2 years ago, and 17 (16%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.

Strong quality — 22% AUM from major funds

22% from top-100 AUM funds
29 of 97 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 22% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
2.2
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.2/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — SAVA

In 2026 Q1, 33 hedge funds were net buyers of SAVA (13 opened a new position, 20 added to an existing one), while 61 reduced or exited (38 trimmed, 23 sold completely) — a 35% buyer ratio, indicating net institutional distribution. 22% of total institutional value in SAVA is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -10 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 98.

Hedge Fund Ownership: SAVA

How many hedge funds hold SAVA — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of SAVA vs. share price

Market Analysis: SAVA

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: SAVA

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

13 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
5.0
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: SAVA
98 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in SAVA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 98 108 -9.26%
13F Shares 15M 15M 1.34%
Total Value $26M $30M -15.29%
New Positions 13 22 -9
Increased Positions 16 25 -9
Closed Positions 23 16 +7
Reduced Positions 38 32 +6
Total Calls 4 6 -33.33%
Total Puts 5 6 -16.67%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.25 1.0 Bearish

Statistics: SAVA

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

98 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in SAVA. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 SAVA holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Gallacher Capital Management LLC 0.04% 64,972 $110K
2 Gmt Capital Corp 0.03% 450,100 $761K
3 NINE MASTS CAPITAL Ltd 0.01% 27,107 $46K
4 Catalyst Funds Management Pty Ltd 0.01% 18,100 $31K
5 Mayport, LLC 0.00% 13,400 $23K
6 Two Sigma Advisers, LP 0.00% 954,800 $1.9M
7 Marshall Wace, LLP 0.00% 2,012,543 $3.4M
8 Two Sigma Investments, LP 0.00% 1,988,814 $3.4M
9 Susquehanna Portfolio Strategies, LLC 0.00% 100,772 $170K
10 Two Sigma Securities, LLC 0.00% 12,696 $21K
11 Signature Equity Partners, LLC 0.00% 2,000 $3K
12 Jacobs Levy Equity Management, Inc 0.00% 209,080 $353K
13 Activest Wealth Management 0.00% 4,001 $7K
14 Graham Capital Management, L.P. 0.00% 25,312 $43K
15 Group One Trading LLC 0.00% 302,624 $511K
16 XTX Topco Ltd 0.00% 33,303 $56K
17 Apollon Wealth Management, LLC 0.00% 35,053 $59K
18 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.00% 326,759 $552K
19 Engineers Gate Manager LP 0.00% 39,494 $67K
20 Mgo One Seven LLC 0.00% 19,826 $34K
21 Verition Fund Management LLC 0.00% 55,200 $93K
22 D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. 0.00% 559,205 $945K
23 AlphaQuest LLC 0.00% 5,026 $10K
24 Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. 0.00% 136,931 $231K
25 Verition Fund Management LLC 0.00% 38,144 $64K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Filana Therapeutics Inc (SAVA)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for SAVA?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SAVA positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for SAVA?

Heavy selling pressure — only 35% buying: Last quarter: 61 funds sold vs only 33 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

What is the fund quality score for SAVA holders?

Strong quality — 22% AUM from major funds: 29 of 97 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 22% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held SAVA?

59% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 58 out of 98 hedge funds have held SAVA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →