Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Filana Therapeutics Inc (SAVA)

81 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in SAVA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -15
Streak
2Q ▼
Buyers last Q
37%

Smart Money Signals — SAVA

Based on 83 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SAVA positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻

Below peak — only 50% of 3.0Y high

50% of all-time peak
Only 83 funds hold SAVA today versus a peak of 167 funds at 2024 Q3 — just 50% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉

Outflows — 18% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
18 fewer hedge funds hold SAVA compared to a year ago (-18% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴

Heavy selling pressure — only 37% buying

34 buying59 selling
Last quarter: 59 funds sold vs only 34 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~11 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 20 → 22 → 13 → 11. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

65% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 65% conviction (2yr+) ■ 23% medium ■ 12% new
54 out of 83 hedge funds have held SAVA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -14%, value -41%

Value
-41%
Shares
-14%
Last quarter: funds added -14% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -41%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
⚠️

Saturation — most institutions already know this story

19 → 20 → 22 → 13 → 11 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 20 → 22 → 13 → 11. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 76% veterans vs 14% newcomers

■ 76% veterans ■ 10% 1-2yr ■ 14% new
Entry-cohort mix of 91 holders: 69 (76%) are 2+ year veterans, 9 entered 1–2 years ago, and 13 (14%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 47% AUM from top-100 funds

47% from top-100 AUM funds
22 of 81 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 47% of total institutional value in SAVA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
1.5
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 1.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — SAVA

In 2026 Q2, 34 hedge funds were net buyers of SAVA (11 opened a new position, 23 added to an existing one), while 59 reduced or exited (33 trimmed, 26 sold completely) — a 37% buyer ratio, indicating net institutional distribution. Net selling has persisted for two consecutive quarters. 47% of total institutional value in SAVA is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -15 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 83.

Hedge Fund Ownership: SAVA

How many hedge funds hold SAVA — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of SAVA vs. share price

Market Analysis: SAVA

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: SAVA

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

7 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
3.9
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: SAVA
81 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in SAVA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 81 98 -17.35%
13F Shares 13M 15M -14.1%
Total Value $15M $26M -41.04%
New Positions 11 13 -2
Increased Positions 19 16 +3
Closed Positions 26 23 +3
Reduced Positions 32 38 -6
Total Calls 5 4 25.0%
Total Puts 5 5 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 1.25 Neutral

Statistics: SAVA

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

81 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in SAVA. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 SAVA holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Gmt Capital Corp 0.03% 450,100 $536K
2 Mayport, LLC 0.00% 13,400 $16K
3 Marshall Wace, LLP 0.00% 1,597,548 $1.9M
4 Two Sigma Investments, LP 0.00% 1,711,358 $2.0M
5 Signature Equity Partners, LLC 0.00% 2,000 $2K
6 XTX Topco Ltd 0.00% 64,614 $77K
7 Activest Wealth Management 0.00% 4,001 $5K
8 Catalyst Funds Management Pty Ltd 0.00% 10,822 $13K
9 Mgo One Seven LLC 0.00% 33,339 $40K
10 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.00% 389,601 $464K
11 Engineers Gate Manager LP 0.00% 31,663 $38K
12 Squarepoint Ops LLC 0.00% 318,380 $379K
13 Group One Trading LLC 0.00% 244,008 $290K
14 Verition Fund Management LLC 0.00% 55,200 $66K
15 Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. 0.00% 132,298 $157K
16 Verition Fund Management LLC 0.00% 46,870 $56K
17 D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. 0.00% 485,025 $577K
18 Apollon Wealth Management, LLC 0.00% 18,895 $22K
19 Federated Hermes, INC. 0.00% 119,952 $143K
20 Quadrature Capital Ltd 0.00% 11,238 $13K
21 Johnson Investment Counsel Inc 0.00% 12,000 $14K
22 NewEdge Advisors, LLC 0.00% 28,300 $34K
23 Walleye Capital LLC 0.00% 20,200 $24K
24 MidFirst Bank 0.00% 1,000 $1K
25 Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co 0.00% 315,889 $376K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Filana Therapeutics Inc (SAVA)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for SAVA?

Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SAVA positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for SAVA?

Heavy selling pressure — only 37% buying: Last quarter: 59 funds sold vs only 34 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

What is the fund quality score for SAVA holders?

Elite ownership — 47% AUM from top-100 funds: 22 of 81 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 47% of total institutional value in SAVA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held SAVA?

65% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 54 out of 83 hedge funds have held SAVA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →