Based on 82 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their RFV positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 94% of 3.0Y peak
94% of all-time peak
82 funds currently hold this stock — 94% of the 3.0-year high of 87 funds (reached 2025 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶
Steady growth — +6% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+5 new funds entered over the past year (+6% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 49% buying
37 buying39 selling
Last quarter: 39 funds reduced or exited vs 37 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~8 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 5 → 13 → 12 → 8. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
55% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 55% conviction (2yr+)
■ 24% medium
■ 21% new
45 out of 82 hedge funds have held RFV for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~8 new funds/quarter
5 → 5 → 13 → 12 → 8 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 5 → 13 → 12 → 8. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 54% veterans vs 28% newcomers
■ 54% veterans
■ 18% 1-2yr
■ 28% new
Entry-cohort mix of 82 holders: 44 (54%) are 2+ year veterans, 15 entered 1–2 years ago, and 23 (28%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 57% AUM from top-100 funds
57% from top-100 AUM funds
16 of 82 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 57% of total institutional value in RFV. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 3.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.