Columbia ETF Tr I (RECS) Hedge Fund Ownership (Q2 2026)

Q: Is it too late to buy Columbia ETF Tr I (RECS) following the 2026 Q2 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, RECS has moved -1.4% since the 2026 Q2 13F filing date (August 14, 2026), compared to -1.8% for the SPY sector ETF — an outperformance of +0.4%. Since the quarter end (June 30, 2026), RECS gained +4.1% vs +2.1% for SPY. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Columbia ETF Tr I (RECS)

184 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in RECS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Smart Money Signals — RECS

Based on 186 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q

For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added RECS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak

186 hedge funds hold RECS right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.

🚀

Fast accumulation — +39% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q

+52 new funds entered over the past year (+39% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.

🟢

More buyers than sellers — 70% buying

128 buying54 selling

Last quarter: 128 funds were net buyers (27 opened a brand new position + 101 added to an existing one). Only 54 were sellers (41 trimmed + 13 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

📈

More new buyers each quarter (+9 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter

Funds opening a new RECS position: 26 → 33 → 18 → 27. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.

🔄

Mostly new holders — 27% entered in last year

■ 20% conviction (2yr+) ■ 52% medium ■ 27% new

Only 38 funds (20%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

📊

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

20 → 26 → 33 → 18 → 27 new funds/Q

New funds entering each quarter: 26 → 33 → 18 → 27. RECS is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.

📊

Mixed cohorts — 16% veterans, 40% new entrants

■ 16% veterans ■ 44% 1-2yr ■ 40% new

Of 186 current holders: 30 (16%) held 2+ years, 82 held 1–2 years, 74 (40%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.

🏆

Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds

55% from top-100 AUM funds

19 of 185 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 55% of total institutional value in RECS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

4.0

out of 10

Moderate Exit Risk

Exit risk score 4.0/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Metric	All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)	Prior (2026 Q1)	Change
Funds Holding	184	172	6.98%
13F Shares	104M	97M	7.79%
Total Value	$4.43B	$3.71B	19.45%
New Positions	27	18	+9
Increased Positions	100	96	+4
Closed Positions	14	18	-4
Reduced Positions	41	41	-
Total Calls	0	0	-
Total Puts	0	0	-
PUT/CALL Ratio	0.0	0.0	Bullish

Metric

All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)

Prior (2026 Q1)

Change

Funds Holding

184

172

6.98%

13F Shares

104M

97M

7.79%

Total Value

$4.43B

$3.71B

19.45%

New Positions

Increased Positions

100

Closed Positions

-4

Reduced Positions

Total Calls

Total Puts

PUT/CALL Ratio

0.0

Bullish

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

184 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in RECS. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:

FILTER:All New Added To Reduced No Change | Overweight >5%

Top 25 RECS holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
#	Investor	% of Portfolio	Shares	Mkt Value
1	Three Cord True Wealth Management, LLC	14.57%	707,539	$30.6M
2	Tower Wealth Partners, Inc.	10.93%	511,314	$22.1M
3	Spectrum Wealth Advisory Group, LLC	10.56%	856,938	$37.1M
4	Drake & Associates, LLC	9.13%	1,252,310	$54.2M
5	Mason & Associates Inc	7.05%	1,008,482	$43.6M
6	Scarborough Advisors, LLC	5.97%	1,202,547	$52.0M
7	Amplius Wealth Advisors, LLC	5.31%	1,675,097	$72.5M
8	Retirement Management Systems Inc.	4.37%	493,262	$21.3M
9	Retirement Planning Group, LLC / Ny	4.05%	171,662	$7.4M
10	Bogart Wealth, LLC	3.47%	2,339,266	$101.2M
11	Stratos Investment Management, LLC	3.35%	2,139,839	$92.6M
12	BlueStem Wealth Partners, LLC	3.30%	765,762	$33.1M
13	Byrne Financial Freedom, LLC	3.25%	192,408	$8.3M
14	Stadion Money Management, LLC	2.95%	791,168	$34.2M
15	Arq Wealth Advisors, LLC	2.58%	468,514	$20.8M
16	Snider Financial Group	2.49%	225,697	$9.8M
17	Alchemi Wealth, LLC	2.40%	118,445	$5.1M
18	R2 Capital Strategies, LLC	2.37%	120,862	$5.2M
19	KWB Wealth	2.35%	635,710	$27.5M
20	Paladin Wealth, LLC	2.34%	93,151	$4.0M
21	WealthCare Investment Partners, LLC	2.08%	197,881	$8.6M
22	First Growth Capital LLC	1.82%	55,371	$2.4M
23	Brown Financial Advisors	1.74%	114,939	$5.0M
24	Whitaker-Myers Wealth Managers, LTD.	1.71%	236,456	$10.2M
25	IAG Wealth Partners, LLC	1.49%	347,443	$15.0M

Investor	Ownership History	% of Portfolio	Prev %	Rank	Conviction	Avg Buy Price	13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y	Sell Timing	Shares	Mkt Value	Change	Change %	Source	Quarter	Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Columbia ETF Tr I (RECS)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for RECS?

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added RECS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for RECS?

More buyers than sellers — 70% buying: Last quarter: 128 funds were net buyers (27 opened a brand new position + 101 added to an existing one). Only 54 were sellers (41 trimmed + 13 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for RECS holders?

Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds: 19 of 185 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 55% of total institutional value in RECS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held RECS?

Mostly new holders — 27% entered in last year: Only 38 funds (20%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Is it too late to buy Columbia ETF Tr I (RECS) following the 2026 Q2 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, RECS has moved -1.4% since the 2026 Q2 13F filing date (August 14, 2026), compared to -1.8% for the SPY sector ETF — an outperformance of +0.4%. Since the quarter end (June 30, 2026), RECS has gained +4.1% vs +2.1% for SPY. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Market Cap	--
Enterprise Value	--
Trailing P/E	--
Forward P/E	--
PEG Ratio (5yr expected)	--
Price/Sales (ttm)	--
Price/Book (mrq)	--
Enterprise Value/Revenue	--
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	--
Beta (5Y Monthly)	--
Short Ratio (Days to Cover)	--
Short % of Float	--

Profit Margin	--
Return on Assets (ttm)	--
Return on Equity (ttm)	--

Revenue (ttm)	--
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm)	--
Diluted EPS (ttm)	--
Total Cash (mrq)	--
Total Debt/Equity (mrq)	--
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm)	--

Columbia ETF Tr I (RECS)

Smart Money Signals — RECS

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

Fast accumulation — +39% more funds vs a year ago

More buyers than sellers — 70% buying

More new buyers each quarter (+9 vs last Q)

Mostly new holders — 27% entered in last year

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

Mixed cohorts — 16% veterans, 40% new entrants

Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds

Institutional Sentiment Summary — RECS

Hedge Fund Ownership: RECS

Market Analysis: RECS

Analyst Price Targets

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Company Profile: RECS

Is It Too Late to Buy Columbia ETF Tr I (RECS) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Hedge Fund Positioning: RECS

Statistics: RECS

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Financial Highlights

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

Frequently Asked Questions — Columbia ETF Tr I (RECS)

Welcome to 13Foresight!