Based on 12 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their QVOY positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 86% of 3.0Y peak
86% of all-time peak
12 funds currently hold this stock — 86% of the 3.0-year high of 14 funds (reached 2024 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 14% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
2 fewer hedge funds hold QVOY compared to a year ago (-14% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 36% buying
5 buying9 selling
Last quarter: 9 funds sold vs only 5 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~2 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 1 → 4 → 2. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 33% long-term, 25% new
■ 33% conviction (2yr+)
■ 42% medium
■ 25% new
Of the 12 current holders: 4 (33%) held >2 years, 5 held 1–2 years, and 3 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~2 new funds/quarter
2 → 0 → 1 → 4 → 2 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 1 → 4 → 2. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 33% veterans, 25% new entrants
■ 33% veterans
■ 42% 1-2yr
■ 25% new
Of 12 current holders: 4 (33%) held 2+ years, 5 held 1–2 years, 3 (25%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100
0% from top-100 AUM funds
3 of 12 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.