Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Ishares Tr (QAT)

31 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in QAT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +1
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
50%

Smart Money Signals — QAT

Based on 31 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added QAT than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
31 hedge funds hold QAT right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +7% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+2 new funds entered over the past year (+7% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction. The peak was reached in just 4 quarters from the low — a sharp move.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 50% buying

15 buying15 selling
Last quarter: 15 funds bought or added vs 15 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~7 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 5 → 7 → 8 → 7. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

58% of holders stayed for 2+ years

58% conviction (2yr+) 13% medium 29% new
18 out of 31 hedge funds have held QAT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~7 new funds/quarter

3 → 5 → 7 → 8 → 7 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 5 → 7 → 8 → 7. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 65% veterans vs 26% newcomers

65% veterans 10% 1-2yr 26% new
Entry-cohort mix of 31 holders: 20 (65%) are 2+ year veterans, 3 entered 1–2 years ago, and 8 (26%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.

Strong quality — 24% AUM from major funds

24% from top-100 AUM funds
12 of 31 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 24% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
3.8
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — QAT

In 2026 Q2, 15 hedge funds were net buyers of QAT (7 opened a new position, 8 added to an existing one), while 15 reduced or exited (9 trimmed, 6 sold completely) — a 50% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 24% of total institutional value in QAT is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +1 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 31.

Hedge Fund Ownership: QAT

How many hedge funds hold QAT — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of QAT vs. share price

Market Analysis: QAT

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: QAT

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

2 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
2.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: QAT
31 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in QAT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 31 30 3.33%
13F Shares 1M 2M -32.06%
Total Value $26M $40M -34.19%
New Positions 7 8 -1
Increased Positions 8 11 -3
Closed Positions 6 7 -1
Reduced Positions 9 4 +5
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: QAT

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

31 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in QAT. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 QAT holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Moneda S.A. Administradora General de Fondos 0.23% 15,582 $280K
2 Sumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management Company, Ltd 0.02% 174,934 $3.1M
3 Knollwood Investment Advisory, LLC 0.02% 12,683 $228K
4 Denali Advisors LLC 0.01% 6,500 $117K
5 TD Waterhouse Canada Inc. 0.01% 244,546 $4.4M
6 Yousif Capital Management, LLC 0.01% 46,924 $845K
7 Ensign Peak Advisors, Inc 0.00% 142,000 $2.6M
8 Nissay Asset Management Corp /Japan 0.00% 55,216 $994K
9 Strengthening Families & Communities, LLC 0.00% 773 $14K
10 Rhumbline Advisers 0.00% 106,249 $1.9M
11 Fifth Third Bancorp 0.00% 46,924 $845K
12 Panagora Asset Management Inc 0.00% 21,597 $389K
13 Mackenzie Financial Corp 0.00% 42,494 $765K
14 4Thought Financial Group Inc. 0.00% 87 $2K
15 MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd. 0.00% 30,535 $550K
16 Hollencrest Capital Management 0.00% 406 $7K
17 Susquehanna International Group, LLP 0.00% 165,180 $3.0M
18 Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group, Inc. 0.00% 19,433 $350K
19 Jane Street Group, LLC 0.00% 110,382 $2.0M
20 Victory Capital Management Inc 0.00% 14,533 $262K
21 Jpmorgan Chase & Co 0.00% 76,405 $1.4M
22 Citadel Advisors LLC 0.00% 15,348 $276K
23 Legal & General Group Plc 0.00% 8,000 $144K
24 BlackRock, Inc. 0.00% 76,539 $1.4M
25 Harbour Investments, INC. 0.00% 47
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Ishares Tr (QAT)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for QAT?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added QAT than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for QAT?

Slight buying edge — 50% buying: Last quarter: 15 funds bought or added vs 15 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for QAT holders?

Strong quality — 24% AUM from major funds: 12 of 31 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 24% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held QAT?

58% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 18 out of 31 hedge funds have held QAT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →