Based on 1728 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added PWR than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
1,728 hedge funds hold PWR right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +37% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+469 new funds entered over the past year (+37% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 53% buying
897 buying781 selling
Last quarter: 897 funds bought or added vs 781 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-6 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 222 → 192 → 269 → 263. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒
53% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 53% conviction (2yr+)
■ 24% medium
■ 24% new
910 out of 1,728 hedge funds have held PWR for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰
Price up while funds trimmed (+1% value, -20% shares)
Last quarter: total value of institutional PWR holdings rose +1% even though funds reduced share count by 20%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
📈
Growing discovery — still being found
176 → 222 → 192 → 269 → 263 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 222 → 192 → 269 → 263. A growing number of institutions are discovering PWR each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 56% veterans vs 29% newcomers
■ 56% veterans
■ 15% 1-2yr
■ 29% new
Entry-cohort mix of 1,783 holders: 1,002 (56%) are 2+ year veterans, 260 entered 1–2 years ago, and 521 (29%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 48% AUM from top-100 funds
48% from top-100 AUM funds
64 of 1720 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 48% of total institutional value in PWR. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.1
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.1/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.