Based on 9 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their PSCQ positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 82% of 3.0Y peak
82% of all-time peak
9 funds currently hold this stock — 82% of the 3.0-year high of 11 funds (reached 2025 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +29% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+2 new funds entered over the past year (+29% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 30% buying
3 buying7 selling
Last quarter: 7 funds sold vs only 3 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~0 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 1 → 2 → 5 → 0. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
56% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 56% conviction (2yr+)
■ 44% medium
■ 0% new
5 out of 9 hedge funds have held PSCQ for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~0 new funds/quarter
2 → 1 → 2 → 5 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 1 → 2 → 5 → 0. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 78% veterans vs 11% newcomers
■ 78% veterans
■ 11% 1-2yr
■ 11% new
Entry-cohort mix of 9 holders: 7 (78%) are 2+ year veterans, 1 entered 1–2 years ago, and 1 (11%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 1% AUM from top-100
1% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 9 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 1% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.