Based on 61 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
🔻
Below peak — only 59% of 3.0Y high
59% of all-time peak
Only 61 funds hold PMVP today versus a peak of 103 funds at 2023 Q1 — just 59% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 9% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
6 fewer hedge funds hold PMVP compared to a year ago (-9% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 54% buying
31 buying26 selling
Last quarter: 31 funds bought or added vs 26 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-10 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 1 → 7 → 19 → 9. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒
56% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 56% conviction (2yr+)
■ 28% medium
■ 16% new
34 out of 61 hedge funds have held PMVP for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +0%, value -100%
Last quarter: funds added +0% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -100%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~9 new funds/quarter
5 → 1 → 7 → 19 → 9 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 1 → 7 → 19 → 9. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Deep conviction — 63% of holders stayed 2+ years
■ 63% veterans
■ 15% 1-2yr
■ 23% new
Of 62 current holders: 39 (63%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 10% AUM from top-100
10% from top-100 AUM funds
14 of 61 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 10% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 1.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.