Based on 74 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added PMTS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊
High ownership — 84% of 3.0Y peak
84% of all-time peak
74 funds currently hold this stock — 84% of the 3.0-year high of 88 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 9% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
7 fewer hedge funds hold PMTS compared to a year ago (-9% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 57% buying
44 buying33 selling
Last quarter: 44 funds bought or added vs 33 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+15 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new PMTS position: 16 → 9 → 4 → 19. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒
46% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 46% conviction (2yr+)
■ 30% medium
■ 24% new
34 out of 74 hedge funds have held PMTS for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -16%, value -99%
Last quarter: funds added -16% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -99%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~19 new funds/quarter
20 → 16 → 9 → 4 → 19 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 16 → 9 → 4 → 19. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Deep conviction — 53% of holders stayed 2+ years
■ 53% veterans
■ 15% 1-2yr
■ 32% new
Of 74 current holders: 39 (53%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
🏆
Elite ownership — 45% AUM from top-100 funds
45% from top-100 AUM funds
21 of 74 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 45% of total institutional value in PMTS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 2.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.